Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue02-01

COMPARATIVE MODALITIES: ANALYZING TENANCY AGREEMENTS IN REGULATORY CONTEXTS

Elaine Wang , Department of Translation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Abstract

This study delves into the nuanced realm of regulatory texts through a comparative analysis of tenancy agreements, focusing on the enactment of modality. Modality, as a linguistic concept, encompasses the expression of necessity, possibility, obligation, and permission within legal discourse. Through a meticulous examination of tenancy agreements from diverse jurisdictions, this research seeks to elucidate the variations in modal expressions, their implications, and their effectiveness in regulating tenancy arrangements. By scrutinizing linguistic modalities across different regulatory contexts, this study offers insights into the intricacies of legal language and its impact on contractual relations within the realm of tenancy.

Keywords

Modality, Regulatory Texts, Tenancy Agreements

References

Baker, M. 1992. In Other Words. London: Routledge.

Baker, M. 2001. Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. London: Routledge.

Bell, R. 1991. Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice. London: Longman.

Biber, D., S. Conrad, and R. Reppen. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, J., R. Perkins, and W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Daogeng, W. [王道庚]. 2006. Legal Translation: Theories and Applications [法律翻译:理论与实 践]. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.

Fleuri, L., M. L. Vasconcellos, and A. Pagano. 2009. “A Representação do Participante “Tradutor/ Translator” em Translators through History e Os Tradutores na História.” In Cadernos de Tradução, Vol. 2, 159–192. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

Gibbons, J. 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Goodrich, P. 1987. Legal Discourse: Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric, and Legal Analysis. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold & University Park Press.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Elaine Wang. (2024). COMPARATIVE MODALITIES: ANALYZING TENANCY AGREEMENTS IN REGULATORY CONTEXTS. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 4(02), 01–07. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue02-01