This article delves into the significance of two distinct rhetorical devices, asyndeton and polysyndeton, within the realm of English prose. As syntactic tools, both devices manipulate the structure and rhythm of sentences to achieve specific effects, enhancing the overall impact of a written piece. Asyndeton involves the deliberate omission of conjunctions, whereas polysyndeton employs the excessive use of conjunctions. By examining various examples and analyzing the underlying mechanics of these devices, this study seeks to shed light on their distinct roles in crafting compelling prose.

Asyndeton,, through its absence of conjunctions, imparts a sense of speed

Brooks, C. Modern Poetry and the Tradition. Oxford University Press, 1957

Burke K. A grammar of motives. – Univ of California Press, 1969. – Т. 177.

Cuddon, J. A. A Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. Wiley-Blackwell, 2013

Fernald, J. C. Syncopations: The stress of innovation in contemporary American poetry. University of Illinois Press, 1993

Genette, G. Figures of Literary Discourse. Columbia University Press, 1997

Jespersen O. Analytic syntax. – University of Chicago Press, 1984.

Lanham R. Analyzing prose. – A&C Black, 2003.

Lanham, R. A. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. University of California Press, 1991

Oliver, D. Syntax and Style in Old English: A Guide to the Grammar of Late West Saxon. Boydell & Brewer, 2014

Propp, V. I. Morphology of the Folktale. University of Texas Press, 2015

Turner M. The role of creativity in multimodal construction grammar //Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik. – 2018. – Т. 66. – №. 3. – С. 357-370.