Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

American Journal of Philological Sciences

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2273
Published Article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ABBREVIATIONS IN ENGLISH AND KARAKALPAK LANGUAGES

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ABBREVIATIONS IN ENGLISH AND KARAKALPAK LANGUAGES

  • Bakhtiyar Berdimuratov
    Intern-Teacher Of The Department “English Linguistics”, Karakalpak State University, Uzbekistan
Language typology, linguistics

This study compares the use of abbreviations in English and Karakalpak languages. Abbreviations are essential for efficient communication and are commonly used in technical and professional settings. English is a widely spoken language, while Karakalpak is a Turkic language spoken in Karakalpakstan. This study examines the similarities and differences between these languages, including their linguistic features and cultural backgrounds. The study compares the frequency, structure, and meaning of abbreviations in both languages and discusses the implications for language learners and professionals. Ultimately, this study contributes to our understanding of cross-cultural communication and the importance of understanding language variation

Abdinazarovna, S. G. (2020). THE REFLECTION FEATURES OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS OF THE ENGLISH, RUSSIAN AND UZBEK LANGUAGES. Тил, таълим, таржима” халқаро журнали, 2(1).

Bakhtiyar, B. (2022). TYPES OF ABBREVIATIONS IN THE KARAKALPAK LANGUAGE. Journal of new century innovations, 16(2), 130-133.

Jumamuratova R., Bayrieva M., & Kaipova S. (2022). SHORTENING OF SPOKEN WORDS IN ENGLISH AND KARAKALPAK LANGUAGES. Экономика и социум, (11-1 (102)), 98-101.

Salomova, G. (2014). THE REFLECTION FEATURES OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. In The Second International conference on development of pedagogical science in Eurasia (pp. 174-176).

Usenova, V. (2022). Word composition in the karakalpak language comparatively with english. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 12(4), 168-172.