This conceptual paper explores the integration of neuropedagogical and competency-based methodologies within engineering education. In this context, the competency-based approach outlines the anticipated professional achievements and the evaluation standards, whereas the neuropedagogical approach specifies the learning conditions necessary to realize these outcomes. Despite typically appearing within the same curriculum, the interaction and integration point between these methodologies are not yet theoretically defined. Through comparative analysis of integration across pedagogical levels, the authors posit that the engineering task stands as the junction connecting both approaches. This convergence is viewed as an advanced integration form, where decision-making in both fields mutually influences task design and evaluation. The paper differentiates between the conditions, principles, mechanisms, and anticipated outcomes of convergence, presenting the mechanism as a hypothesis. Four criteria are suggested for verifying claims of a 'new quality': mutual modification of the two fields, deep integration, distinguishing outcome from process, and drawing meaningful comparisons. This culminates in a theoretical foundation for crafting convergent learning tasks and guiding their empirical investigation.
A Conceptual Framework for Neuropedagogical And Competency-Based Approaches in Engineering Education
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
Downloads
References
Aleksandrova, G. A. (2025). Convergent concept of the development of teacher education. Vestnik Chuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. I. Ya. Yakovleva, (4), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.37972/chgpu.2025.129.4.006
Astreiko, S. Ya., & Lukashenya, Z. V. (2025). Convergent approach as a methodological basis for technology-oriented pedagogical research. Vestnik BarGU. Seriya: Pedagogicheskie nauki. Psikhologicheskie nauki. Filologicheskie nauki (literaturovedenie), (1), 6-12.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Blinova, T. L. (2018). Convergent approach in teaching. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, (8), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.26170/po18-08-06
Bourne, K., Rickabaugh, J., Hambourger, M., Klima, V., Ogwu, M. C., Plummer, G., Swarthout, R., Siegel, J., & Hendren, C. O. (2025). Research-to-action multidisciplinary projects: An undergraduate convergence research course. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 875. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05202-2
Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X026008004
Chervonnyi, M. A., & Vlasova, A. A. (2022). A study of convergent learning in school education in teacher training. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, (5), 123-131. https://doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2022-5-123-131
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9
Dehaene, S. (2020). How we learn: Why brains learn better than any machine... for now. Viking.
Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
Herr, D. J. C., Akbar, B., Brummet, J., Flores, S., Gordon, A., Gray, B., & Murday, J. (2019). Convergence education-An international perspective. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 21, Article 229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4638-7
Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817-824. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817
International Engineering Alliance. (2021). Graduate attributes and professional competencies (Version 4).
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Tackling creativity at its roots: Evidence for different patterns of EEG alpha activity related to convergent and divergent modes of task processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 84(2), 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.02.012
Kondakov, A. M., & Sergeev, I. S. (2020). Education in a convergent environment: Statement of the problem. Pedagogika, 84(12), 5-22.
Lee, C., & Kim, Y. (2025). Analyzing the conceptual ambiguity of 'AI convergence education' for elementary and secondary education in Korea. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 28(10), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2025.28.10.004
Mamina, I. V. (2022). Convergent approach in education. Sovremennaya nachal'naya shkola, (10), 6-8. https://files.s-ba.ru/publ/primary-school/2022/41.pdf
Morgan, M., Webster, A. J., Morrison, R. R., Stone, M. C., Stone, A. B., Boll, J., & Srinivasan, J. (2026). Convergence research: Contributions from sustainable regional systems. Ecology and Society, 31(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-16796-310103
National Research Council. (2014). Convergence: Facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18722
National Science and Technology Council. (2022). Convergence education: A guide to transdisciplinary STEM learning and teaching. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED630556.pdf
National Science Foundation. (n.d.). Learn about convergence research. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.nsf.gov/funding/learn/research-types/learn-about-convergence-research
OECD. (2007). Understanding the brain: The birth of a learning science. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264029132-en
Pervova, G. M. (2014). Convergence of methods as a trend in the modern development of pedagogy. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy, 9(6), 73-77.
Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.). (2002). Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science [NSF/DOC-sponsored report]. National Science Foundation.
Shtager, E. V. (2022). Disciplinary convergence as a mechanism for modernizing the educational space of an engineering university. Filosofiya obrazovaniya, 22(1), 154-170. https://doi.org/10.15372/PHE20220110
Strimel, G. J., Briller, S., Otto, J., Martinez, R., Pruim, D., & Kelley, T. R. (2026). Convergence education in a STEM-focused university: An ethnographic study of a cross-college design and innovation program. International Journal of STEM Education, 13, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-026-00610-5
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Thomas, M. S. C., Ansari, D., & Knowland, V. C. P. (2019). Annual research review: Educational neuroscience: Progress and prospects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(4), 477-492.
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011). Mind, brain, and education science: A comprehensive guide to the new brain-based teaching. W. W. Norton & Company.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504993
Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470-477. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20040
Zhironkina, O. V. (2021). Domestic and foreign experience in analyzing the phenomenon of pedagogical convergence. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 5(3), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2021-5-3-201-211