The preparation of future engineers increasingly requires higher education institutions to move beyond the transmission of disciplinary knowledge toward the systematic development of professional competence that integrates engineering knowledge, practical skills, problem-solving ability, communication, teamwork, ethical responsibility, digital literacy, and readiness for lifelong learning. This study examines the organizational and pedagogical conditions necessary for developing the professional competence of future engineers in contemporary higher education. The research is based on a qualitative comparative analysis of international engineering education standards and peer-reviewed studies concerning engineering competencies, active learning, problem- and project-based learning, authentic engineering practice, and curriculum design. The analysis demonstrates that professional competence develops most effectively when educational objectives are aligned with measurable learning outcomes, theoretical and practical training are integrated, students engage with authentic engineering problems, cooperation with industry is institutionalized, digital technologies are embedded in professional tasks, and assessment is designed to evaluate performance rather than reproduction of theoretical information. The study further establishes that these conditions should operate as an interconnected educational system rather than as separate methodological innovations. Particular attention is given to the role of curriculum coordination, engineering projects, laboratory and industrial experience, faculty methodological competence, formative feedback, and continuous programme improvement. The findings provide a methodological basis for designing engineering education environments oriented toward graduates’ readiness for professional activity.
Organizational and Pedagogical Conditions for Developing the Professional Competence of Future Engineers
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
Downloads
References
ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2025–2026 [Electronic resource]. – Baltimore, MD : ABET, 2025. – URL: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2025-2026/ (accessed: 10.09.2026).
European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education. EUR-ACE® Framework Standards and Guidelines. – Brussels : ENAEE, 2021. – URL: https://www.enaee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/EAFSG-04112021-English-1-1.pdf (accessed: 10.09.2026).
Male S. A., Bush M. B., Chapman E. S. Perceptions of competency deficiencies in engineering graduates // Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. – 2010. – Vol. 16, No. 1. – P. 55–68. – DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2010.11464039.
Male S. A., Bush M. B., Chapman E. S. An Australian study of generic competencies required by engineers // European Journal of Engineering Education. – 2011. – Vol. 36, No. 2. – P. 151–163. – DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2011.569703.
Passow H. J. Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? // Journal of Engineering Education. – 2012. – Vol. 101, No. 1. – P. 95–118. – DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00043.x.
Crawley E. F., Malmqvist J., Östlund S., Brodeur D. R., Edström K. Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. – 2nd ed. – Cham : Springer, 2014. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9.
Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research // Journal of Engineering Education. – 2004. – Vol. 93, No. 3. – P. 223–231. – DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
Prince M. J., Felder R. M. Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases // Journal of Engineering Education. – 2006. – Vol. 95, No. 2. – P. 123–138. – DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.
Freeman S., Eddy S. L., McDonough M., Smith M. K., Okoroafor N., Jordt H., Wenderoth M. P. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. – 2014. – Vol. 111, No. 23. – P. 8410–8415. – DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Chen J., Kolmos A., Du X. Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: A review of literature // European Journal of Engineering Education. – 2021. – Vol. 46, No. 1. – P. 90–115. – DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615.
Litzinger T., Lattuca L. R., Hadgraft R., Newstetter W. Engineering education and the development of expertise // Journal of Engineering Education. – 2011. – Vol. 100, No. 1. – P. 123–150. – DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00006.x.
Martin R., Maytham B., Case J., Fraser D. Engineering graduates’ perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry // European Journal of Engineering Education. – 2005. – Vol. 30, No. 2. – P. 167–180. – DOI: 10.1080/03043790500087571.