Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume06Issue03-28

Contextual Meanings of Legal Terminology in Press Discourse: Metaphorization And Semantic Narrowing/Widening

Usmonova Oyshajon Rozmatovna , TSUL, Acting Associate Professor, Uzbekistan

Abstract

Legal terminology is traditionally associated with semantic precision, conceptual stability, and institutional regulation. However, when legal terms migrate from codified legal texts into press discourse, they frequently undergo contextual semantic transformation. This article examines the contextual meanings of legal terminology in press discourse, with particular attention to metaphorization and semantic narrowing/widening as mechanisms of semantic modification. Drawing on a comparative corpus of English-language and Uzbek-language newspapers, the research applies an integrated framework combining terminology theory, lexical semantics, and discourse analysis. The findings demonstrate that legal terms in press discourse acquire layered meanings shaped by rhetorical, ideological, and communicative factors. Metaphorization intensifies narrative framing, semantic widening enables evaluative and ideological extension, and semantic narrowing facilitates accessibility through simplification. The study argues that contextual semantic transformation reflects discursive adaptation rather than terminological degradation. These results contribute to legal linguistics, media discourse studies, and contemporary terminology theory by illustrating the dynamic interplay between institutional legal meaning and media-mediated public communication.

Keywords

Legal terminology, press discourse, contextual meaning

References

Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. Continuum.

Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods and applications. John Benjamins.

Cruse, D. A. (2004). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The language of the law. Little, Brown and Company.

Tiersma, P. (1999). Legal language. University of Chicago Press.

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.

Wüster, E. (1979). Introduction to the general theory of terminology and terminological lexicography. Springer.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Usmonova Oyshajon Rozmatovna. (2026). Contextual Meanings of Legal Terminology in Press Discourse: Metaphorization And Semantic Narrowing/Widening. International Journal Of Literature And Languages, 6(03), 138–141. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume06Issue03-28