Background: Classical Arabic and medieval Hebrew poetic corpora repeatedly stage a tension between fate (decree, providence, destiny) and human agency (heroism, ethical choice, endurance). At the same time, comparative humanities research faces a methodological problem: how can scholars responsibly interpret cultural meanings—especially around “ultimate” concepts such as decree, redemption, sanctity, and death—without reducing them to a single doctrinal key? This study addresses that problem by reading major Arabic and Hebrew textual witnesses on fate and heroism while also drawing methodological lessons from early ethnographic-linguistic documentation practices in the Andaman Islands, where careful attention to vocabulary, grammar, and contextual usage was treated as foundational to interpretation (Radcliffe-Brown, 1914; Nigam, 1964; Ganguly, 1966).

Methods: The research employs a qualitative comparative approach: (1) thematic mapping of fate/agency and life/death sanctity across selected Arabic texts (Abu Tammām, 1981; Ibn ‘Abd Rabbihi, 1986; Ibn Al-Muqaffa, 1934; Altabrizi, 1937; Alhussein, 2019; Al-Mutanabbī, 2008) and Hebrew texts/analyses (Halevy, 1946; Hanagid, 1966, 1985, 1985a, 1993; Ibn Ezra, 1935; Levin, 1962, 1962a, 1964; Elizur, 1994, 2004; Dor, 2015), and (2) methodological triangulation using early Andamanese language records as a cautionary template for interpretive discipline (Radcliffe-Brown, 1914, 1948; Nigam, 1964; Ganguly, 1966).

Results: The analysis finds that (a) “decree” functions less as fatalistic closure than as a poetic instrument for evaluating courage and moral clarity (Alhussein, 2019; Abu Tammām, 1981), (b) the “drawn sword” motif dramatizes redemption and death against the value of life, producing an ethical dialectic rather than a single heroic ideology (Dor, 2015), and (c) medieval Hebrew secular and religious poetics negotiate time, cosmos, and historical crisis through flexible metaphors of flight, suffering, and commandment—often aligning personal agency with divinely framed temporality (Levin, 1962, 1962a, 1964; Elizur, 1994, 2004; Halevy, 1946).

Conclusion: A cross-tradition model emerges: fate is repeatedly “activated” by poetic form—through aphorism, exemplum, lament, praise, and ethical narrative—so that destiny becomes a field of responsibility rather than resignation. Methodologically, the Andamanese documentation record reinforces the necessity of lexical, grammatical, and contextual rigor as a guardrail against interpretive overreach in comparative literary studies (Radcliffe-Brown, 1914; Nigam, 1964; Ganguly, 1966; Radcliffe-Brown, 1948).

Comparative poetics, fate and agency, heroism, sanctity of life

Abu Tammām, Ḥabīb Ibn Aws. 1981. Diwan Alhamasa [The Diwan of Heroism]. Edited by Aliya Hawi. Beirut.

Alhussein, Hala ‘Oisha. 2019. “Alqazaa wa-alqadar fi alfikr aljahali [Decree and Faith in Jahiliyya Thought].” Algam’aldrasat Alaslamiyya, 265–290.

Al-Mutanabbī, Abū al-Ṭayyib Aḥmad ibn al-Ḥusayn. 2008. Available at: https://www.noor-book.com/

Altabrizi, Zakariyya. 1937. Dhakaar alarab. Diwan Abu Tammām [Arabic Treasures – The Diwan of Abu Tammām]. Egypt: Dar Alm’araf.

Dor, Nitza. 2015. “Motiv ha-herev ha-shelufa, geula u-mavet mul qedushat ha-ḥayyim [The Motif of the Drawn Sword, Redemption and Death vs. the Sanctity of Life].” Ma’amaqim, Virtual Periodical, No. 55. https://www.daat.ac.il/daat/ktav_et/maamar.asp?ktavet=1&id=1619

Elizur, Shulamit. 1994. “Ve-ha-yamim mezuvim mi-eloha [And the Days Are Commanded from God].” In Israel Levin Jubilee Volume: Studies in Hebrew Literature. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.

Elizur, Shulamit. 2004. Shirat ha-hol ha-‘ivrit be-sefarad ha-muslemit [Secular Hebrew Poetry in Muslim Spain]. Vol. II. Raanana: The Open University of Israel.

Ganguly, Pranab. 1966. “Vocabulary of the Negritos of Little Andaman with Grammatical Notes and Materials.” Bulletin of the Anthropological Survey of India, 15(1–4): 1–30.

Halevy, Judah. 1946. Kol Shirei Yehuda Halevy [The Collected Poems of Judah Halevy]. Tel Aviv.

Hanagid, Samuel. 1966. Hadiwan [The Diwan]. Edited by Dov Yarden. Jerusalem.

Hanagid, Samuel. 1985. Ben Mishlei [Son of Proverbs]. Project Ben Yehuda. https://benyehuda.org/read/225

Hanagid, Samuel. 1985a. Hadiwan [The Diwan]: Ben Tehilim [Son of Psalms]. Edited by Dov Yarden. Jerusalem.

Hanagid, Samuel. 1993. Ben Qohelet [Son of Ecclesiastes]. Edited by David Yellin. Jerusalem.

Ibn ‘Abd Rabbihi, Ahmad. 1986. Al-ʿIqd al-Farīd [The Unique Necklace]. Edited by Abad Al-Magid Al-Tarhini. Beirut: Almaktabh Alshamilh.

Ibn Al-Muqaffa, Abdallah. 1934. Kelila wa Dimna. Edited by Muhammad Al-Masrafi. Cairo.

Ibn Ezra, Moses. 1935. Shirei Hol [Secular Poems]. Edited by H. Brody. Jerusalem.

Levin, Israel. 1962. “Zeman ve-tevel be-shirat ha-hol ha-‘ivrit bimey habeynayyim [Time and Cosmos in Secular Hebrew Poetry in the Middle Ages].” In Ozar Yehudei Sefarad [The Treasury of the Jews of Spain], Vol. 5, 68–79. Jerusalem.

Levin, Israel. 1962a. “Habriha min ha-‘olam el ha-elohim [Flight from the World to God].” In Ozar Yehudei Sefarad [The Treasury of the Jews of Spain], Vol. 5, 160–162. Jerusalem.

Levin, Israel. 1964. “Ha-sevel be-mashber ha-reqonqista be-shirat rihal [Suffering the Crisis of the Reconquista in the Poetry of R. Judah Halevy].” In Ozar Yehudei Sefarad [The Treasury of the Jews of Spain], Vol. 7, 36–49. Jerusalem.

Nigam, R. C. 1964. Report on Field Investigations: Onge Speech. Anthropological Survey of India.

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1914. “Notes on the Languages of the Andaman Islands.” Anthropos, 9: 36–52.

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1948. The Andaman Islanders. Illinois.