This article investigates the pragmatic functions of first-person pronouns (I/we) in political speeches and formal writing across multiple language systems. By analyzing the discourse of prominent political leaders such as Shavkat Mirziyoyev, Joe Biden, and Emmanuel Macron, the study explores how first-person pronouns function to construct authority, inclusiveness, and responsibility. The research highlights variation across languages in terms of politeness, formality, and rhetorical strategy. Methodologically, the study employs comparative discourse analysis and pragmatic interpretation of political and academic texts. The findings demonstrate that the usage of "I" versus "we" reflects not only linguistic norms but also culturally embedded leadership styles.

First-person pronouns, political speech, formal writing

Bull, P. (2021). The language of leaders: Political rhetoric and the British prime ministerial debates of 2010–2019. Palgrave Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72288-9 (Focuses on how British politicians manipulate pronouns (“I” vs. “We”) to construct authority).

Fairclough, N. (2022). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge. (Foundational work on critical discourse analysis; covers pronoun usage in institutional and political discourse).

Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2020). Leadership, discourse, and ethnicity. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198835535.001.0001 (Explores how leaders use pronouns to build identity and solidarity across cultures).

Karimov, B. (2024). Linguistic features of Uzbek political speeches: The pragmatic function of personal pronouns. Modern Trends in Discourse Analysis, 7(1), 45–59. (Examines “men” vs. “biz” in official Uzbek discourse, highlighting inclusive/exclusive meanings).

Khayrullaeva, N., & Karimova, Z. (2023). Pragmatic analysis of personal pronouns in Uzbek political discourse. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 4(2), 112–123.

https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v4i2.217 (Offers quantitative and qualitative analysis of Uzbek political speech, focusing on the persuasive function of pronouns).

O’Keeffe, A., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge handbook of pragmatics (2nd ed.). Routledge. (Covers cross-cultural and genre-based pragmatics of pronouns in political and institutional discourse).

Saussure, L. de, & Schulz, P. J. (2020). Manipulation and ideologies in the twentieth century: Discourse, language, mind. John Benjamins.

https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.86 (Discusses ideological use of first-person pronouns in mass media and political language).

Schmid, H.-J. (2021). The dynamics of social meaning: Pragmatics, cognition, and society. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867239.001.0001 (Theoretical insights into how social cognition and context shape pronoun interpretation).

Wodak, R. (2021). The politics of fear: The shameless normalization of far-right discourse (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. (Analyses strategic use of “we” vs. “they” in constructing in-group/out-group identities).

Yuldashev, A., & Turdaliyeva, D. (2023). Translation challenges in rendering deictic pronouns from Uzbek to English. Journal of Translation and Language Studies, 5(3), 98–110. (Comparative analysis of how pronouns lose pragmatic nuance in cross-linguistic translation).