The Expression of Causative, Resultative and Ditransitive Constructions in English And Uzbek Languages

Abstract

In the sphere of aspectual semantics, relevance plays an important role in special research due to the diversity of methods and means of expression. This is because resilience is also characterized by the ability to be expressed in specific units and structures. This led to the selection of resilience as a separate research object. On a constructional approach, we can understand aspects of the final interpretation involving caused motion, intended transfer, or caused result to be contributed by the respective constructions. That is, we can understand skeletal constructions to be capable of contributing arguments. For example, we can define the ditransitive construction to be associated directly with agent, patient, and recipient roles, and then associate the class of verbs of creation with the ditransitive construction. We do not need to stipulate a specific sense of bake unique to this construction. In general, we can understand the direct objects found in the above examples to be licensed not directly as arguments of the verbs but by the particular constructions.

Keywords

Construction, semantics, resultative