Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/Volume06Issue02-12

Smart Contracts and Enforceability Under U.S. Commercial Law

Shokhjakhon Toshtemirov Orifjon Ugli , Master of Laws graduate of Pennsylvania State University, Uzbekistan

Abstract

The development of blockchain technology has introduced smart contracts as a new form of automated commercial agreement. Smart contracts are self-executing programs that perform contractual obligations when predetermined conditions are met, reducing the need for intermediaries and increasing efficiency in commercial transactions. Their growing use raises important legal questions regarding their validity and enforceability under existing legal systems, particularly under U.S. commercial law. This article examines the legal nature and enforceability of smart contracts within the framework of United States commercial law. It analyzes whether smart contracts satisfy the essential elements of contract formation, including offer, acceptance, consideration, and mutual assent. The article also explores the applicability of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and its role in recognizing electronic and automated agreements. The article concludes that smart contracts can be legally enforceable under U.S. commercial law if they meet traditional contract requirements. Existing legal principles are flexible enough to accommodate smart contracts, making them a reliable tool for modern digital commerce.

Keywords

Smart contracts, blockchain technology, contract formation

References

Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday;

Werbach, K., & Cornell, N. (2017). Contracts ex machina. Duke lj, 67, 313;

Raskin, M. (2016). The law and legality of smart contracts. Geo. L. Tech. Rev., 1, 305;

Durovic, M., & Lech, F. (2019). The enforceability of smart contracts. Italian LJ, 5, 493;

De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the law: The rule of code. Harvard University Press;

Raskin, M. (2016). The law and legality of smart contracts. Geo. L. Tech. Rev., 1, 305;

Cheshire, F. (1991). Furmston. Law of Contract. I Ith ed, 234;

Moore, M. (2022). Developments in Contract Law: The 2020-2021 Term–Appeals to Fairness. Supreme Court Law Review, 106, 3;

Williston, S., & Lord, R. A. (1957). A Treatise on the Law of Contracts. (No Title);

Corbin, A. L., Perillo, J. M., Bender, H. H., Holmes, E. M., Brown, C. N., Kniffin, M. N., ... & Linzer, P. (1952). Corbin on contracts. (No Title);

Cheshire, F. (1991). Furmston. Law of Contract. I Ith ed, 234;

Kettering, K. C. (2023). Coordination of the Uniform Commercial Code and Common Law. U. Cin. L. Rev., 92, 31;

Miller, F. H., & Harrell, A. C. (2003). The law of modern payment systems. (No Title);

Shiffrin, S. V. (2022). Hidden Delegations: The Assignment of Contractual;

Murray Jr, J. E. (2012). The Dubious Status of the Rolling Contract Formation Theory. Duq. L. Rev., 50, 35;

De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the law: The rule of code. Harvard University Press;

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Shokhjakhon Toshtemirov Orifjon Ugli. (2026). Smart Contracts and Enforceability Under U.S. Commercial Law. International Journal of Law And Criminology, 6(02), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/Volume06Issue02-12