The general principles of law recognized by civilized nations constitute a foundational source of international law, codified in Article 38(1)(c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Their significance lies in bridging gaps in treaty and customary law, thereby ensuring coherence and stability in the international legal order. This article provides an extensive examination of the international legal consolidation of general principles of law, addressing their historical roots, doctrinal interpretations, judicial applications, and codification efforts within the framework of international organizations. The study explores the ways in which such principles operate as a source of authority, how courts and tribunals deploy them in practice, and the challenges of universal recognition in a pluralistic legal order. Furthermore, the article engages in a comparative evaluation of recent codification efforts by the International Law Commission (ILC) (2023), and examines debates on the future role of general principles in the evolving landscape of international governance, human rights, and global economic regulation. The findings demonstrate that consolidation of these principles is indispensable for legitimizing international law, addressing fragmentation, and advancing common values in the global legal system.

General principles of law, international law, ICJ Statute

Bassiouni, M. C. (1999). International Criminal Law (2nd ed.). Transnational Publishers.

Brownlie, I. (2012). Principles of Public International Law (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cheng, B. (1953). General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge University Press.

D’Aspremont, J. (2019). The Critical Attitude and the International Law Commission’s Work on General Principles of Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 32(4), 833–851.

International Court of Justice (ICJ). (1962). Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand). ICJ Reports.

International Court of Justice (ICJ). (1969). North Sea Continental Shelf Cases. ICJ Reports.

International Court of Justice (ICJ). (1974). Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France; New Zealand v. France). ICJ Reports.

International Court of Justice (ICJ). (1982). Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libya). ICJ Reports.

International Court of Justice (ICJ). (1988). Border and Transborder Armed Actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras). ICJ Reports.

International Court of Justice (ICJ). (1997). Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia). ICJ Reports.

International Criminal Court (ICC). (2012). Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. ICC-01/04-01/06.

International Law Commission (ILC). (2023). Draft Conclusions on Identification and Application of General Principles of Law. United Nations.

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). (2011). Advisory Opinion on Activities in the Area. Case No. 17.

Koskenniemi, M. (2006). Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. ILC Report.

Mutua, M. (2000). What is TWAIL? American Society of International Law Proceedings, 94, 31–39.

Schlesinger, R. (1957). Comparative Law: Cases, Text, Materials. The Foundation Press.

Schwebel, S. (2009). The Effectiveness of International Decisions. Martinus Nijhoff.

Shaw, M. (2021). International Law (9th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Sornarajah, M. (2017). Resistance and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment. Cambridge University Press.

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO Publishing.

WTO Appellate Body. (1998). United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products. WTO Doc. WT/DS58/AB/R.

Zimmermann, R. (1996). The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford University Press.