International regulation and practice of responsibility of the state as a participant in private international law
Abstract
The notion of state responsibility in private international law embodies a complex dimension that interweaves traditional public international law principles with the realities of cross-border transactions and disputes involving non-state actors. Historically, the doctrine of state responsibility arose as a mechanism by which one state could hold another accountable for breaches of international obligations, particularly in contexts where diplomatic protection served as the primary avenue for individual claimants seeking remedies for wrongful acts.
Keywords
Foreign direct investment, cross-border commercial transactions, human rights normsHow to Cite
References
Briggs, A. (2021). The Conflict of Laws. Oxford University Press.
Brownlie, I. (2008). Principles of Public International Law. Oxford University Press.
Collins, L. (Ed.) (2005). Essays on State Immunity. Oxford University Press.
Crawford, J. (2013). State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge University Press.
Dicey, A. V., Morris, J. H. & Collins, L. (2012). The Conflict of Laws. Sweet & Maxwell.
Dickinson, A., Lindsay, R., & Loonam, J. P. (Eds.) (2004). State Immunity: Selected Materials and Commentary. Oxford University Press.
ICSID Convention (1965). International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Shaw, M. N. (2017). International Law. Cambridge University Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kodirjonov Azizbek Murodjonovich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.