Public Trust in the Brazilian Legal System: A Comprehensive Analysis of Court Experiences
Abstract
This study explores the level of public trust in the Brazilian legal system, with a particular focus on individuals' experiences within the court system. Given Brazil's complex social and political context, public confidence in the legal system plays a crucial role in ensuring justice, accountability, and societal stability. This research employs both qualitative and quantitative methods, analyzing surveys and interviews with Brazilian citizens who have interacted with the court system. The study examines factors that contribute to or undermine trust, such as perceived fairness, efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of the courts. Additionally, the research looks into the broader social and political dynamics, including corruption, legal reforms, and media portrayals, which influence public attitudes towards the judiciary. Findings suggest that while many Brazilians express concern over corruption and delays in legal proceedings, trust in the judiciary can be bolstered by reforms focused on increasing transparency, efficiency, and accountability. The results of this study provide valuable insights for policymakers and legal professionals seeking to strengthen the Brazilian legal system and enhance public confidence in its ability to deliver justice.
Keywords
Public trust, Brazilian legal system, court experiencesHow to Cite
References
Bennack, Frank A. (1999). How the Public Views the State Courts: A Report on the National Survey. Paper Presented at the National Conference on Public Trust and Confidence in justice System. Washington, DC. 14 May 1999.
Benesh, Sara C. (2006). Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts. Journal of Politics, 68: 697–707.
Benesh, S. & S. Howell (2001). ‘Confidence in the Courts: A Comparison of Users and Non-users.’ Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 19: 199–214.
Clausen B.,Kraay, A. & Nyiri, Z.(2011).Corruption and Confidence in Public Institutions : Evidence from a Global Survey. World Bank Economic Review, VOL. 25, NO. 2, pp. 212–249.
Cluzel, L., & Sibony, A.L. (2001). Qualité et évaluation de la justice: Colloque tenu a l’Ecole Nationale de la Magistrature - 21-22 mai 2001: Rapport de synthese. Mission de recherche Droit et Justice & Ecole nationale de la magistrature.
Hellman, J., & Daniel K.(2004). “The Inequality of Influence”. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=386901 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.386901.
Lambsdorff, J. (1999). “Corruption in Empirical Research: A Review.” TransparencyInternational Working Paper.
Levasseur, Alain A. (2002). Legitimacy of Judges. American Journal of Comparative Law50 (Autumn): 43–85.
Olson, S. M., & Huth, D. A., (1998). Explaining Public Attitudes Toward LocalCourts, Justice SystemJournal, 20, 41.
Pharr, S. J. (2000). Official’s misconduct and public distrust: Japan and the trilateraldemocracies. In S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies:What’s troubling the trilateral countries (pp. 173-201). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Francisco Cavaco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.