EXPLORING DIGITAL VIGILANTISM: FACEBOOK USERS' PERSPECTIVES ON ONLINE NAMING AND SHAMING
Abstract
This study delves into the phenomenon of digital vigilantism, specifically focusing on Facebook users' perspectives regarding online naming and shaming practices. Digital vigilantism, characterized by individuals or groups taking justice into their own hands in online environments, has garnered increased attention in the era of social media. Through qualitative analysis of user attitudes and experiences on Facebook, this research sheds light on the motivations, perceptions, and consequences associated with online naming and shaming. By exploring the dynamics of digital vigilantism within the context of social networking platforms, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of contemporary forms of online justice and their impact on digital communities.
Keywords
Digital vigilantism, online naming and shaming, social mediaHow to Cite
References
Appadurai A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Arvanitidis T. (2016). Publication bans in a Facebook age: How internet vigilantes have challenged the youth criminal justice act’s ‘secrecy laws’ following the 2011 Vancouver Stanley Cup Riot. Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology, 5(1), 18–32. Crossref.
Braithwaite J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
Bratich J. (2009). Secret agents: Popular icons beyond James Bond. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Bright M. (2000, July 30). Scores of paedophiles forced into hiding. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/media/2000/jul/30/privacy.childprotection
Brown R. (1975). Historical studies of American violence and vigilantism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Carlton B. (2016, March 2). Lawyers concerned over vigilante Facebook pages. Tasmanian Talks. Retrieved from https://www.tasmaniatalks.com.au/the-show/731-name-and-shame-facebook-pages-cause-concern-for-lawyers
Clarke R. (1980). Situational crime prevention: Theory and practice. The British Journal of Criminology, 20(2), 136–147. Crossref. ISI.
Clarke, R. V. (2005). Seven misconceptions of situational crime prevention. In N. Tilley (Ed.), Crime Prevention and Community Safety (pp. 39–70). London, UK: Routledge.
De Laurentiis D., Landers H., Roberts B. (Producers), & Winner M. (Director). (1974). Death wish [Motion picture]. United States: Paramount Pictures.
De Vries A. (2015). The use of social media for shaming strangers: Young people’s views. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2053–2062). Kauai, HI: IEEE. 10.1109/HICSS.2015.215
Dimsdale T. (1866/2003). The vigilantes of Montana. Guilford, CT: TwoDot Books.
Dubose M. (2007). Holding out for a hero: Reaganism, comic book vigilantes, and Captain America. The Journal of Popular Culture, 40(6), 915–935. Crossref.
Ferrell J. (2013). Cultural criminology and the politics of meaning. Critical Criminology, 21(3), 257–271. Crossref. ISI.
Ferrell J., Hayward K., Young J. (2008). Cultural criminology: An invitation. London, UK: SAGE Publication.
Fink A. (2003). The survey handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication. Crossref.
Friedman L. (1985). A history of American law. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ruth M Howes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.