This article analyzes the transformative potential of political televised debates in the context of developing democratic processes, focusing on the experiences of Uzbekistan and South Korea. Through empirical analysis based on survey data collected in Tashkent and a comparative review of debate practices in South Korea, the paper highlights the role of debates as a dynamic tool of political communication and voter influence. The research evaluates the impact of debates on electoral competitiveness, digital integration, and democratic culture through the theoretical lenses of agenda-setting and mediatization. Practical recommendations are proposed for improving Uzbekistan’s political debate model in line with international standards.

Televised debates, political communication, electoral competitiveness

Benoit, W.L., Hansen, G.J., & Verser, R.M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 70(4), 335-350.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Mediatization of Communication. De Gruyter Mouton.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

Jamieson, K. H., & Birdsell, D. S. (1988). Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. Oxford University Press.

Lee, S. (2019). Youth participation and televised debates in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(2), 234–250.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.

Park, J., & Cho, H. (2021). Political media engagement in Korea: From television to digital platforms. Korean Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 47–66.

Tolipov, F. (2017). Uzbekistan’s media landscape: Between reform and control. Central Asian Affairs, 4(3), 241–258.