Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2141
Published Article

Pedagogical, Psychological, And Didactic Features of Summative Assessment for Students

Pedagogical, Psychological, And Didactic Features of Summative Assessment for Students

  • Yerkabayev Khusniddin Sultanovich
    Independent Researcher, Tashkent State University of Economics, Uzbekistan
Summative assessment formative assessment quality of education

This article analyzes the specific pedagogical, psychological, and didactic features of summative assessment used in the general secondary education system. It scientifically substantiates the role of summative assessment in the educational process, its impact on students' learning motivation, and its significance in measuring the level of achievement of educational objectives.    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-6108 “On measures to develop the fields of education, upbringing, and science in the new development period of Uzbekistan”, dated November 6, 2020.

Methodological guidelines on the assessment system within the framework of the Concept for the Development of the Public Education System and the National Curriculum. – Tashkent, 2021.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

Muslimov, N. A. et al. (2015). Fundamentals of Pedagogical Competence and Creativity. – Tashkent.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1991). Educational Psychology. – Moscow: Pedagogika.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.