This paper explores methodological approaches to forensic stylistics, focusing on the role of style analysis in legal contexts. Forensic stylistics examines how lexical, syntactic, pragmatic, and discourse-level features of language provide evidence in authorship attribution, text authenticity verification, and the interpretation of disputed documents. The study highlights both qualitative and quantitative methods, including corpus analysis, comparative stylistics, and computational techniques, which enable experts to detect distinctive authorial patterns. By combining these approaches, forensic stylistics ensures a more balanced and reliable evaluation of linguistic evidence. The paper also addresses challenges such as deliberate disguise, stylistic variability across genres, and limited text samples, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration between linguists and legal practitioners. Ultimately, methodological rigor in stylistic analysis strengthens the objectivity and transparency of forensic linguistic expertise, ensuring that linguistic evidence serves as a credible and scientifically grounded tool within judicial processes.