Articles
| Open Access | The Evolution Of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Comprehensive Review Of Techniques, Technological Innovations, And Environmental Consequences
Abstract
Background: Hydraulic fracturing is an indispensable technology for extracting oil and gas from unconventional reservoirs, fundamentally altering the global energy landscape. However, its operational complexity and environmental footprint necessitate continuous innovation. A comprehensive synthesis of traditional techniques, emerging innovations, and associated environmental impacts is required to guide future development.
Objective: This article provides a systematic review of hydraulic fracturing, charting its evolution from foundational methods to cutting-edge technologies. It aims to (1) analyze the principles and applications of various fracturing techniques, (2) highlight key technological innovations in fluids and methods, and (3) critically evaluate the environmental impacts and corresponding mitigation strategies.
Methods: The analysis is based on a structured review of seminal and contemporary literature. The works are categorized to compare proppant and acid fracturing; assess applications in diverse geologies like shale, high-pressure/high-temperature, and mature fields; and examine novel methods, including supercritical CO2, foam-based, and plasma-based fracturing. The review integrates findings from field case studies and advanced simulation models to connect theory with practice.
Results: The review confirms a clear technological progression from water-intensive conventional methods to waterless or reduced-water alternatives designed to enhance efficiency and minimize environmental risks. Innovations like supercritical CO2 and plasma fracturing offer promising solutions for shale reservoirs. Advanced modeling techniques have proven crucial for optimizing fracture network complexity and well performance in challenging environments. While these innovations address key issues like water consumption, significant environmental challenges, particularly concerning water management and induced seismicity, persist.
Conclusion: The future of hydraulic fracturing hinges on developing and deploying technologies that are both economically viable and environmentally sustainable. While significant progress has been made, current predictive models for managing environmental risks remain a key area for improvement. Future research must focus on the long-term scalability of novel techniques and the creation of integrated models that fully account for complex geological and environmental interactions.
Keywords
Hydraulic Fracturing, Unconventional Reservoirs, Shale Gas, Proppant Fracturing
References
Agarwal, M., & Kudapa, V. K. (2022a). Comparing the performance of supercritical CO2 fracking with high energy gas fracking in unconventional shale. MRS Energy & Sustainability, 1-8.
Agarwal, M., & Kudapa, V. K. (2022b). Plasma-based fracking in unconventional shale – A review. Materials Today: Proceedings.
Agarwal, M., & Kudapa, V. K. (2022c). Foam-based fracking in unconventional shale reservoir. Materials Today: Proceedings.
Ben-Naceur, K., & Economides, M. J. (1988, November). The effectiveness of acid fractures and their production behavior. In SPE Eastern Regional Meeting. OnePetro.
Cipolla, C. L., Lolon, E., Erdle, J., & Tathed, V. S. (2009, October). Modeling well performance in shale-gas reservoirs. In SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference. OnePetro.
Clark, J. B. (1949). A hydraulic process for increasing the productivity of wells. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1(1), 1-8.
Cook, C. C., & Brekke, K. (2002, February). Productivity preservation via hydraulic propped fractures in the Eldfisk North Sea chalk field. In International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control. OnePetro.
Daneshy, A. (2010). Hydraulic fracturing to improve production. The Way Ahead, 6(3), 14-17.
Dora, T. K., Iqbal, M. I., Krishna, K. V., Mahapatra, S. R., Alnuumani, M. A., & Al Rajawy, I. (2022). Application of low-temperature fracturing fluid system in oil reservoir–A breakthrough approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 68, 780-784.
Fredd, C. N., McConnell, S. B., Boney, C. L., & England, K. W. (2000, March). Experimental study of hydraulic fracture conductivity demonstrates the benefits of using proppants. In SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition. OnePetro.
Kudapa, V. K., Kumar, S., Gupta, D. K., Sharma, P., & KunhAbdulla, R. (2017b, May). Modelling of gas production from shale matrix to fracture network. In SPE Intelligent Oil and Gas Symposium. OnePetro.
Kudapa, V. K., Sharma, P., Kunal, V., & Gupta, D. K. (2017a). Modeling and simulation of gas flow behavior in shale reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 7(4), 1095-1112.
Li, Y., Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Che, M., Zhang, F., & Peng, J. (2009, January). Propped fracturing in high temperature deep carbonate formation. In SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. OnePetro.
Mayrhofer, K. J. J., Strmcnik, D., Blizanac, B. B., Stamenkovic, V., Arenz, M., & Markovic, N. M. (2008). Measurement of oxygen reduction activities via the rotating disc electrode method: From Pt model surfaces to carbon-supported high surface area catalysts. Electrochimica Acta, 53(7), 3181-3188.
Mayrhofer, S., Van Hoek, A. H., Mair, C., Huys, G., Aarts, H. J., Kneifel, W., & Domig, K. J. (2010). Antibiotic susceptibility of members of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group using broth microdilution and molecular identification of their resistance determinants. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 144(1), 81-87.
Nagel, N., Gil, I., Sanchez-Nagel, M., & Damjanac, B. (2011, January). Simulating hydraulic fracturing in real fractured rocks—overcoming the limits of pseudo3D models. In SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. OnePetro.
Navarre, S. E. (1998). Salvador Minuchin's structural family therapy and its application to multicultural family systems. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 19(6), 557-570.
Roberts, L. D., & Guin, J. A. (1975). A new method for predicting acid penetration distance. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 15(4), 277-286.
Rückheim, J., Voigtlaender, G., & Stein-Khokhlov, M. (2005, June). The technical and economic challenge of mature gas fields: The giant Altmark field, a German example. In SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference. OnePetro.
Soliman, M. S. M., Abdel-Rahman, E. M., El-Saadany, E. F., & Mansour, R. R. (2008). A wideband vibration-based energy harvester. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 18(11), 115021.
Veatch, R. W., & Moschovidis, Z. A. (1986, March). An overview of recent advances in hydraulic fracturing technology. In International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering. OnePetro.
Vega, G., Negron-Perez, E., & Abass, H. (1997, August). Hydraulic fracturing hot, high pressure oil and gas wells in tectonically active fields in Eastern Venezuela. In Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. OnePetro.
Wang, Y., Zhang, F., Cheng, X., Peng, J., Li, Y., & Li, S. (2006, May). A case study: Re-fracturing of high temperature deep well in carbonate reservoir. In SPE Technical Symposium of Saudi Arabia Section. OnePetro.
Warpinski, N. R., Mayerhofer, M. J., Vincent, M. C., Cipolla, C. L., & Lolon, E. P. (2009). Stimulating unconventional reservoirs: maximizing network growth while optimizing fracture conductivity. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 48(10), 39-51.
Wedman, M. L., Lynch, K. W., & Spearman, J. W. (1999, May). Hydraulic fracturing for sand control in unconsolidated heavy-oil reservoirs. In SPE Western Regional Meeting. OnePetro.
Zoveidavianpoor, M., Samsuri, A., & Shadizadeh, S. R. (2011, March). The needs for hydraulic fracturing in Iranian carbonate oilfields: Acid or propped fracture? In 1st National Conference of Novel Technologies in Oil & Gas Industries, IAU, Iran (pp. 3-4).
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Prof. Helena Santos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.