Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ajast/Volume05Issue05-07

Evaluation of The Efficiency of Selected Catalysts for The Pyrolysis of a Propane–Butane Fraction

Sanjar H. Saidqulov , Laboratory assistant, Department of Polymer Chemistry and Chemical Technologies, Institute of Biochemistry, Samarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov, Samarkand, Uzbekistan
Normurot I. Fayzullayev , Doctor of Chemical Sciences, Professor, Samarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov, Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Polymer Chemistry and Chemical Technologies, Samarkand, Uzbekistan
Hayitali N. Ibodullayev , Student, Institute of Biochemistry, Samarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov, Samarkand, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficiency of selected catalysts for the pyrolysis of a propane–butane fraction under inert, oxygen-free conditions. Experiments were conducted in both pulse and flow reactors within a temperature range of 650–860 °C. Catalyst performance was assessed based on conversion and selectivity. In a quartz reactor, thermal cracking led to high yields of unsaturated hydrocarbons, especially ethylene and propylene, with ethylene selectivity reaching 55% at 730 °C. Flow reactors with Zn-, Cu-, Mn-, and Fe-based coatings showed that the Zn-coated system provided the highest olefin yield (62.2 wt.%) and minimal coke formation (0.24%). Activation energy analysis indicated that Zn required less energy (150–200 kJ/mol), supporting a radical reaction mechanism. The catalytic activity followed the order: Zn > Cu > Mn > Fe. The enhanced performance of Zn is attributed to its low oxidation state and hydrogenation capability, which suppresses coke formation. These results demonstrate the critical role of catalyst material and reaction environment in maximising olefin production during propane–butane pyrolysis.

Keywords

Propane–butane, catalytic activity, ethylene

References

Kabir, G.; Hameed, B.H. Recent progress on catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass to high-grade bio-oil and bio-chemicals. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 70, 945–967.

Gurevich-Messina, L.I.; Bonelli, P.R.; Cukierman, A.L. In-situ catalytic pyrolysis of peanut shells using modified natural zeolite. Fuel Process. Technol. 2017, 159, 160–167.

Bhoi, P.R.; Ouedraogo, A.S.; Soloiu, V.; Quirino, R. Recent advances on catalysts for improving hydrocarbon compounds in bio-oil of biomass catalytic pyrolysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 121, 109676

Ayyash, A.; Apaydın Varol, E.; Kılıç, M.; Özsin, G. Influence of aging on the rheological behavior and characteristics of bio-oil produced from olive pomace via slow pyrolysis. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2022, 1–14

Rahman, M.M.; Liu, R.; Cai, J. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass over zeolites for high quality bio-oil—A review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2018, 180, 32–46

Dada, T.D.; Sheehan, M.; Murugavelh, S.; Antunes, E. A review on catalytic pyrolysis for high-quality bio-oil production from biomass. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023, 13, 2595–2614.

Puértolas, B.; Veses, A.; Callen, M.; Sharon, M.; Garcia, T.; Ramirez-Pérez, J. Porosity–acidity interplay in hierarchical ZSM-5 zeolites for pyrolysis oil valorization to aromatics. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 3283–3293.

Pütün, E.; Uzun, B.B.; Pütün, A.E. Fixed-bed catalytic pyrolysis of cotton-seed cake: Effects of pyrolysis temperature, natural zeolite content and sweeping gas flow rate. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 701–710.

Galadima, A.; Muraza, O. In situ fast pyrolysis of biomass with zeolite catalysts for bioaromatics/gasoline production: A review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 105, 338–354.

Rezaei, P.S.; Shafaghat, H.; Daud, W.M.A.W. Production of green aromatics and olefins by catalytic cracking of oxygenate compounds derived from biomass pyrolysis: A review. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2014, 469, 490–511.

Özbay, N.; Yargıç, A.Ş.; Yarbay-Şahin, R.Z. Tailoring Cu/Al2O3 catalysts for the catalytic pyrolysis of tomato waste. J. Energy Inst. 2018, 91, 424–433.

Toro-Trochez, J.L.; De Haro Del Río, D.A.; Sandoval-Rangel, L.; Bustos-Martínez, D.; García-Mateos, F.J.; Ruiz-Rosas, R.; Rodríguez-Mirasol, J.; Cordero, T.; Carrilo-Pedraza, E.S. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of soybean hulls: Focus on the products. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2022, 163, 105492.

Varol-Apaydın, E.; Erülken, Y. A study on the porosity development for biomass based carbonaceous materials. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. E 2015, 54, 37–44

Saynik, P.B.; Moholkar, V.S. Investigations in influence of different pretreatments on A. donax pyrolysis: Trends in product yield, distribution & chemical composition. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2021, 158, 105276.

Choi, S.J.; Park, S.H.; Jeon, J.K.; Lee, I.G.; Ryu, C.; Suh, D.J.; Park, Y.K. Catalytic conversion of particle board over microporous catalysts. Renew. Energy 2013, 54, 105–110

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Sanjar H. Saidqulov, Normurot I. Fayzullayev, & Hayitali N. Ibodullayev. (2025). Evaluation of The Efficiency of Selected Catalysts for The Pyrolysis of a Propane–Butane Fraction. American Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 5(05), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajast/Volume05Issue05-07