This article examines the linguistic and extra-linguistic challenges of rendering onomastic units (proper names, place names, and hydronyms) in bilingual dictionaries. It addresses the problem of losing cultural connotations during the translation process. A comparative-typological analysis was conducted using existing English-Russian and English-Uzbek lexicographic sources. The study employs the method of component analysis to identify semantic gaps. The research identifies that standard translation equivalents often fail to convey the "onomastic aura" of a name. It categorizes the primary problems into phonetic distortion, morphological adaptation, and the lack of culturological commentary. The findings suggest a need for "encyclopedic" entries within bilingual dictionaries for specific onomastic layers. The study proposes a model for combined transcription and descriptive translation to preserve the national identity of the source units.
Problems of Interpreting Onomastic Units in Bilingual Dictionaries
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
References
Hartmann, R. R. K., & James, G. (1998). “Dictionary of Lexicography”. London: Routledge. (Pages 101;105)
Mill, J. S. (1843). “A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive”. London: John W. Parker. (Pages 31–36)
Newmark, P. (1988). “A Textbook of Translation”. New York: Prentice-Hall. (Pages 214-215)
Tarp, S. (2008). “Lexicography in the Borderland between Knowledge and Communication”. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. (Pages 121; 154)
Van Langendonck, W. (2007). “Theory and Typology of Proper Names”. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Pages 7–12; 84)
Vermes, L. (2003). “Proper Names in Translation”. In “The Translation Journal”, Vol. 7, No. 2.
Coates R. On the Structure of English Toponyms. London, 2000.(24-25)
Karimov S. “Atoqli otlarni tarjima qilish muammolari”, Til va tarjima, 2020.(102-103)
Wierzbicka A. Understanding Cultures Through Keywords. Oxford UP, 1997.(90-97)