Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume06Issue03-02

The Epistemic and Interpretative Role of Metaphor in Uzbek Scientific Discourse

Shahlo Khamroeva Mirdjanovna , Computational Linguistic and Digital Technology, Tashkent State University of Uzbek Language and Literature, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Sulaymonova Mahfuza Shavkatovna , Computational Linguistic and Digital Technology, Tashkent State University of Uzbek Language and Literature, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article examines the epistemic and interpretative role of metaphor in Uzbek scientific discourse from a cognitive-discursive perspective. The study investigates how metaphorical units contribute to the formation, conceptualization, structuring, and interpretation of scientific knowledge in Uzbek-language academic texts. The theoretical framework is grounded in Conceptual Metaphor Theory developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. The research is based on a corpus of Uzbek scientific articles, dissertations, and monographs, within which metaphorical expressions were identified, classified, and systematized into conceptual models. The corpus comprises texts from linguistics, pedagogy, and social sciences, allowing cross-disciplinary comparison of metaphorical patterns. The analysis demonstrates that structural, ontological, and orientational metaphors function as cognitive instruments that facilitate nomination, terminological stabilization, theoretical modeling, and explanatory coherence. Scientific processes are frequently conceptualized through metaphors of construction, mechanisms, systems, motion, and spatial relations, enabling abstract knowledge to be interpreted through embodied experiential domains. The findings confirm that metaphor in Uzbek scientific discourse operates not as a decorative stylistic device, but as a fundamental epistemic and interpretative mechanism structuring scientific reasoning and shaping knowledge representation.

Keywords

Uzbek scientific discourse, conceptual metaphor, epistemic function

References

George Lakoff, Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

George Lakoff. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

Zoltán Kövecses. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Teun A. van Dijk. Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Norman Fairclough. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.

Elena Semino. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Mahmudov N.. Til va tafakkur. Toshkent: Fan, 2013.

Nurmonov A.. Lingvistik tadqiqot metodologiyasi. Toshkent: Fan, 2010.

Safarov Sh.. Kognitiv tilshunoslik asoslari. Toshkent: Akademnashr, 2006.

Yo‘ldoshev B.. Matn lingvistikasi asoslari. Toshkent: Fan, 2008.

Rasulov R.. Umumiy tilshunoslik. Toshkent: O‘qituvchi, 2012.

Ne’matov H.. Tilshunoslikning dolzarb masalalari. Toshkent: Fan, 2015.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Shahlo Khamroeva Mirdjanovna, & Sulaymonova Mahfuza Shavkatovna. (2026). The Epistemic and Interpretative Role of Metaphor in Uzbek Scientific Discourse. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 6(03), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume06Issue03-02