This research paper examines the distinctive features of official and unofficial discourses within the field of urban development. It is established that lexical units in official discourse predominantly possess positive or neutral connotations (construction, design, modern, infrastructure). Such vocabulary positions urban development as a symbol of progress and qualitative transformation. Conversely, unofficial discourse is dominated by critical, emotionally charged, and negatively evaluative lexemes (demolition, congestion, dust, obstruction, concreting). This indicates the presence of a certain level of public dissatisfaction and concern regarding urban construction processes.

Official discourse, analysis, forms of communication

Арутюнова, Н.Д. Дискурс / Н.Д. Арутюнова // Лингвистическая энциклопедия. –М.: Сове, энциклопедия, 1990. – С. 136-137. - Ахманова О.С., Словарь лингвистических терминов. Изд. 4-е, стереотипное. – М.: Ком.Книга, 2007. – C. 576.

Сафаров Ш. С. Лингвистика дискурса. Челябинск, 2018. –315 с;

Сафаров Ш. С. Лингвистика дискурса. Челябинск, 2018. –315 с;

Муслимов Н.А. Касб таълими ўқитувчисини касбий ривожлантиришнинг назарий методик асослари. Дисс. ... пед. фан. докт. – Т.: 2007. – 315 б.

Маслова, В. А. Лингвокультурология / В. А. Маслова. − М.: Академия, 2001. − 208 c. Алпатов, В. М. Об антропоцентричном и системоцентричном подходах к языку ;