This article examines baraka, qut, and rizq – three culturally loaded concepts that recur across the Uzbek macrosystem of blessing speech acts (olqish-duo-tilak) – as linguoculturological “cultural codes” encoding a shared Turkic-Islamic worldview of abundance, fortune, and divinely apportioned sustenance. Drawing on post-Soviet linguoculturology (Maslova, Karasik, Teliya, Vorobyov) and Anna Wierzbicka’s Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM), the study decomposes each concept into a small set of semantic primes to make its culture-specific logic explicit and cross-linguistically comparable. The analysis is carried out on an illustrative corpus of Uzbek blessing formulas drawn from modern Uzbek prose (O‘tkir Hoshimov, G‘afur G‘ulom) and everyday ritual speech, each example glossed and matched against the nearest available English rendering. The comparison shows that baraka, qut, and rizq occupy different positions on a cline of translatability: rizq achieves partial equivalence with English providence/sustenance through a shared (if secularized) Abrahamic substrate; baraka is only partially rendered by blessing/grace, losing its component of transferable, quasi-material potency; qut is the least translatable of the three, showing near-zero equivalence, because English lacks a corresponding folk concept of charismatic vital fortune inherited from pre-Islamic and early Islamic Turkic cosmology (as codified in Yusuf Khass Hajib’s Qutadgu Bilig). The article argues that this three-tier equivalence cline (full/partial/zero) is not incidental but reflects a deeper lacunarity in the English conceptual lexicon of blessing, with direct consequences for translation practice and for lexicographic work on Uzbek–English cultural correspondence.
Cultural Codes of Blessing in Uzbek And English: Baraka, QUT, And RIZQ Through the Lens of The Natural Semantic Metalanguage
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dankoff, R. (1983). Yusuf Khass Hajib: Wisdom of Royal Glory (Kutadgu Bilig): A Turko-Islamic Mirror for Princes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Geertz, C. (1968). Islam Observed: Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Izutsu, T. (1964). God and Man in the Koran: Semantics of the Koranic Weltanschauung. Tokyo: Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies.
Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [The Linguistic Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena.
Maslova, V. A. (2001). Lingvokul’turologiya [Linguoculturology]. Moscow: Academia.
Safarov, Sh. (2008). Pragmalingvistika [Pragmalinguistics]. Tashkent: Fan.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teliya, V. N. (1996). Russkaya frazeologiya: Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokul’turologicheskiy aspekty [Russian Phraseology: Semantic, Pragmatic, and Linguoculturological Aspects]. Moscow: Shkola “Yazyki russkoy kul’tury”.
Gʻafur Gʻulom. Tanlangan asarlar. Nazm va nasr. - T.: Gʻafur Gʻulom nomidagi nashriyot-matbaa ijodiy uyi, 2012. - 352 b.
Vorobyov, V. V. (1997). Lingvokul’turologiya: Teoriya i metody [Linguoculturology: Theory and Methods]. Moscow: RUDN.
Wierzbicka, A. (1985). A Semantic Metalanguage for a Cross-cultural Comparison of Speech Acts and Speech Genres. Language in Society, 14(4), 491–514.
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.