Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

American Journal of Philological Sciences

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2273
Published Article

A Comparison of The Features Forming Realistic Literature as A National and Cultural Heritage: Based on English And Uzbek Classical Realism of the 19th–20th Centuries

A Comparison of The Features Forming Realistic Literature as A National and Cultural Heritage: Based on English And Uzbek Classical Realism of the 19th–20th Centuries

  • Khodjayeva Shoira Bekbergenovna
    Lecturer at Urgench Innovation University, Uzbekistan
Realism national-cultural heritage English literature

This article examines the comparative features of English and Uzbek classical realism of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries as literary systems that formed and preserved national and cultural heritage. The study focuses on the ways in which realistic literature reflected social reality, moral values, historical change, national consciousness, and the everyday life of ordinary people. English realism is considered through the works of such writers as Charles Dickens, William Makepeace Thackeray, George Eliot, Thomas Hardy and others, while Uzbek classical realism is analyzed through the literary heritage of Abdulla Qodiriy, Cholpon, Fitrat, Oybek, Gafur Gulom and other representatives of modern Uzbek literature. The article reveals that both literary traditions used realism not only as a method of artistic representation, but also as a means of preserving collective memory, criticizing social injustice, depicting moral conflicts and strengthening national identity. At the same time, the comparison shows that English realism developed mainly in the context of industrialization, urbanization and class contradictions, whereas Uzbek realism was closely connected with enlightenment, national awakening, colonial experience and the transformation of traditional society. The results of the research demonstrate that realistic literature becomes a form of national-cultural heritage when it reflects the historical experience of a people, embodies their moral ideals and preserves the living image of social life in artistic form.

Аристотель. Поэтика. — Москва: Искусство, 1957. — 184 с.

Бахтин М.М. Вопросы литературы и эстетики. — Москва: Художественная литература, 1975. — 504 с.

Белинский В.Г. Собрание сочинений: в 9 т. Т. 3. — Москва: Художественная литература, 1978. — 624 с.

Веселовский А.Н. Историческая поэтика. — Москва: Высшая школа, 1989. — 406 с.

Dickens Ch. Oliver Twist. — London: Penguin Classics, 2003. — 608 p.

Dickens Ch. David Copperfield. — London: Penguin Classics, 2004. — 1024 p.

Eliot G. Middlemarch. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. — 904 p.

Hardy T. Tess of the d’Urbervilles. — London: Penguin Classics, 2003. — 592 p.

Thackeray W.M. Vanity Fair. — London: Penguin Classics, 2001. — 912 p.

Лукач Г. К теории реализма. — Москва: Гослитиздат, 1939. — 392 с.

Wellek R., Warren A. Theory of Literature. — New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1949. — 403 p.

Watt I. The Rise of the Novel. — Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957. — 319 p.

Қодирий А. Ўткан кунлар. — Тошкент: Ғафур Ғулом номидаги Адабиёт ва санъат нашриёти, 1992. — 384 б.

Қодирий А. Меҳробдан чаён. — Тошкент: Шарқ, 2009. — 304 б.

Чўлпон А. Асарлар: 3 жилдлик. 1-жилд. — Тошкент: Ғафур Ғулом номидаги нашриёт-матбаа бирлашмаси, 1994. — 448 б.

Фитрат А. Танланган асарлар. — Тошкент: Маънавият, 2000. — 256 б.

Ойбек. Қутлуғ қон. — Тошкент: Ғафур Ғулом номидаги Адабиёт ва санъат нашриёти, 1983. — 368 б.

Ғулом Ғ. Танланган асарлар. — Тошкент: Ғафур Ғулом номидаги Адабиёт ва санъат нашриёти, 1984. — 432 б.

Каримов Н. ХХ аср ўзбек адабиёти тараққиётининг ўзига хос хусусиятлари. — Тошкент: Фан, 1993. — 212 б.

Қўшжонов М. Ўзбек романчилигининг ривожланиш босқичлари. — Тошкент: Фан, 1985. — 240 б.