Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

American Journal of Philological Sciences

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2273
Published Article

Pragmalinguistic Strategies In Business Email Correspondence And Meeting Discourse: Politeness Conventions, Turn-Taking, And Conversational Implicature

Pragmalinguistic Strategies In Business Email Correspondence And Meeting Discourse: Politeness Conventions, Turn-Taking, And Conversational Implicature

  • Kholmetova Gulshoda Shahzod kizi
    Student, Chirchik State Pedagogical University, Uzbekistan
  • Prof. Ahmad Baisov
    Assoc. Scientific advisor, PhD, Chirchik State Pedagogical University, Uzbekistan
Business email face management politeness

This article analyzes the pragmalinguistic strategies deployed in two central genres of professional English communication: business email correspondence and business meeting interaction. Drawing on Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory, the turn-taking model of Sacks, Schegloff, and Jefferson, and Grice’s Cooperative Principle, the study examines how professional communicators manage face, allocate conversational turns, and exploit conversational implicature to accomplish institutional and interpersonal goals. The analysis demonstrates that indirect request strategies, modal hedging, and cooperative discourse markers are characteristic features of both genres, and that their deployment is shaped by cross-cultural norms that constitute a key dimension of professional communicative competence in international business contexts.

Writing business: Genres, media and discourses. Routledge.

Bjørge, A. K. (2007). Power distance in English lingua franca email communication. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00133.x

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On lingua franca English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8

Gains, J. (1999). Electronic mail: A new style of communication or just a new medium? English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00028-8

Giménez, J. C. (2000). Business e-mail communication: Some emerging tendencies in register. English for Specific Purposes, 19(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00030-8

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Handford, M. (2010). The language of business meetings. Cambridge University Press.

Khakimov, M. (2013). Fundamentals of pragmalinguistics. Akademnashr.

Koester, A. (2006). Investigating workplace discourse. Routledge.

Poncini, G. (2004). Discursive strategies in multicultural business meetings. Peter Lang.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010

Safarov, Sh. (2008). Pragmalinguistics. O'zME.

Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: Women and men at work. Morrow.

Zhu, Y. (2012). Politeness in email requests in cross-cultural settings. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(3), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2012.2208393