Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2265
Published Article

Effectiveness of An Artificial Intelligence–Based History-Taking System for Identifying Risk Factors for Arterial Hypertension in Primary Health Care

Effectiveness of An Artificial Intelligence–Based History-Taking System for Identifying Risk Factors for Arterial Hypertension in Primary Health Care

  • Dilfuza Z. Yarmukhamedova
    DSc, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Diseases in Family Medicine No. 1 and Fundamentals of Preventive Medicine, Tashkent State Medical University, Tashkent, 100109, Uzbekistan
  • Nigora B. Nuritdinova
    PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Diseases in Family Medicine No. 1 and Fundamentals of Preventive Medicine, Tashkent State Medical University, Tashkent, 100109, Uzbekistan
  • Surayyo M. Shukurdjanova
    PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Diseases in Family Medicine No. 1 and Fundamentals of Preventive Medicine, Tashkent State Medical University, Tashkent, 100109, Uzbekistan
Artificial intelligence primary health care arterial hypertension

Background. Timely identification of risk factors for arterial hypertension (AH) is essential for prevention, but in busy primary care settings history taking is often incomplete. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools may help collect a more complete history in less time.

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of an AI-based history-taking system for identifying AH and its risk factors in primary health care.

Methods. A total of 106 patients aged 20–50 years who attended a pre-physician consultation room for a preventive examination or for elevated blood pressure were randomly assigned to history taking by a physician using a standard protocol (n = 53) or by an AI-based adaptive questionnaire system (n = 53). The identification of five groups of risk factors, the completeness of recommendations, interview duration and patient-rated convenience were compared.

Results. The AI system identified each risk factor more often than the traditional interview; the differences were significant for smoking (83.0% vs 56.6%; p = 0.006) and for excessive salt intake or unbalanced diet (79.2% vs 54.7%; p = 0.013). Interview duration was 6.4 ± 1.1 minutes with the AI system and 12.1 ± 1.2 minutes with the traditional method (p < 0.001). Patients in the AI group more often received complete recommendations on blood pressure self-monitoring (77.4% vs 50.9%; p = 0.009), additional examinations (83.0% vs 62.3%; p = 0.029) and long-term follow-up (86.8% vs 60.4%; p = 0.004). Mean convenience scores were 4.5 and 3.8 on a five-point scale, respectively.

Conclusion. An AI-based history-taking system can improve the identification of AH risk factors, particularly behavioral ones, halve the time needed for history taking and provide a basis for individualized preventive recommendations in primary care.

Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021.

World Health Organization. A global brief on hypertension: silent killer, global public health crisis. Geneva: WHO; 2013.

Yusuf S, Joseph P, Rangarajan S, et al. Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):795–808.

GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1223–1249.

Tran BX, Vu GT, Ha GH, et al. Global evolution of research in artificial intelligence in health and medicine: a bibliometric study. J Clin Med. 2019;8(3):360.

Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(4):230–243.

World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. Operational framework for primary health care: transforming vision into action. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF; 2020.

Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56.

Handelman GS, Kok HK, Chandra RV, et al. Peering into the black box of artificial intelligence: evaluation metrics of machine learning methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(1):38–43.

Gnambs T, Kaspar K. Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis. Behav Res Methods. 2015;47(4):1237–1259. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0533-4

Blease C, Kaptchuk TJ, Bernstein MH, et al. Artificial intelligence and the future of primary care: exploratory qualitative study of UK general practitioners’ views. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(3):e12802. doi:10.2196/12802