The article examines the linguocultural foundations of subjectivity in English academic discourse, analyzing how cultural norms, epistemic conventions, and authorial identity interact within scientific texts. An integrative analytical framework combining linguocultural theory, stance theory, and systemic-functional grammar is proposed to account for the multidimensional nature of subjective expression in academic writing.

Subjectivity, academic discourse, authorial stance

Benveniste E. Problems in general linguistics. – Miami: University of Miami Press, 1971. – P. 316.

Benveniste E. Subjectivity in language // Journal of General Linguistics. – 1958. – Vol. 1. – P. 1-14.

Biber D., Finegan E. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect // Text. – 1989. – Vol. 9. – P. 93-124.

Halliday M. A. K. An introduction to functional grammar. – London: Edward Arnold, 1994. – P. 179.

Hyland K. Academic discourse: English in a global context. – London: Continuum, 2009. – P. 256.

Hyland K. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. – London: Continuum, 2005. – P. 230.

Hyland K. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. – London: Longman, 2000. – P. 212.

Kress G., van Leeuwen T. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. – London: Arnold, 2001. – P. 142.

Levinson S. C. Pragmatics. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. – P. 420.

Martin J. R., White P. R. R. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. – London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. – P. 278.

Sharifian F. Cultural linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2017. – P. 251.

Thompson G. Introducing functional grammar. – London: Arnold, 2004. – P. 287.

Wierzbicka A. Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. – Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991. – P. 502.