Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home
Login Register

International Journal Of Literature And Languages

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2834
Published Article

Linguocognitive Analysis Of Homonyms (Using Uzbek And Turkish Languages As Examples)

Linguocognitive Analysis Of Homonyms (Using Uzbek And Turkish Languages As Examples)

Authors

  • Abdurahmanova M.T.
    Doctor of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Uzbek Linguistics, Faculty of Journalism and Uzbek Philology, National University of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume06Issue01-33

Keywords:

Lexical homonymy homoneme semanteme interlingual homonymy polysemy

Abstract

World linguistics conducts research aimed at studying linguistic units within the comparative-historical and systemic-structural paradigm. Additionally, special attention is given to the study of the anthropocentric paradigm - specifically, investigating the semantics of linguistic units based on cognitive, psycholinguistic, and pragmatic approaches. Of practical significance are the analysis of speech mechanisms, worldview, processes of reflecting existential information in linguistic consciousness, assimilation of word meanings and retention of concepts in linguistic memory, perception of object and event characteristics, semantic development of lexemes, and lexical clarification of the form-content relationship in understanding meaning through a linguacognitive approach.

This article analyzes the linguacognitive characteristics of homonyms and their usage statistics in the Uzbek and Turkish languages.

References

Mirtojiyev M. Polysemy in the Uzbek language. - Tashkent: Fan, 1975. - 31 p.

Musabayeva Z. Homonyms in Mahmud Kashgari's "Divan-u Lughat at-Turk" (11th century): Abstract of dissertation for Candidate of Philological Sciences. - Frunze: 1975. - P.11.

Rahmatullayev Sh. Dictionary of Uzbek Homonyms. - Tashkent, 1984. - 214 p.

Shaker I.T. Lexical non-derived noun homonyms and their representation in dictionaries. Abstract of dissertation for Candidate of Philological Sciences. - Voronezh, 2013. - 25 p.

Shaykevich A.Ya. On the principles of homonym classification // Processes of language development. - Moscow, 1959.- P. 127.

Asker R. Divanü Lugat-it-Türk Statistics. Proceedings of the 2nd International Turkology Research Symposium: Mahmud al-Kashgari and his era (28-30 May 2008) [e-book] /Ankara: Turkish Language Association, 2022. - P.64-65.

Uçar A. Semantic Relatedness: The Distinction Between Polysemy and Homonymy in Turkish Verbs [Anlambilimsel Bağlantılılık: Türkçe Eylemlerde Çokanlamlılık ve Eşadlılık Ayrımı] 2009, In S. Ay, Ö. Aydın, İ. Ergenç, S. Gökmen, S. İşsever and D. Peçenek (Eds.), Essays on Turkish Linguistics: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 6-8 August 2008, - P.207 - 216.

Hadra Kübra, Erkinay Tamtamış. A Historical Journey from Polysemy to Homonymy [Çok Anlamlılıktan Eş Adlılığa Doğru Tarihsel Bir Yolculuk] folk/ed. Journal, 2022; 28 (1) - P. 109.