This article examines the communicative-pragmatic functions of hyponymy in English and Uzbek media texts. Hyponymy is usually studied as a paradigmatic relation within the lexical system; this study treats it as a discourse resource that journalists deploy to achieve specific communicative aims. The research material consists of news reports, analytical articles and headlines from English-language (BBC News, The Guardian,) and Uzbek-language (Kun.uz, Xalq so‘zi) online media. Contextual, component, comparative and discourse-pragmatic analyses were applied. The results identify six recurrent functions of hyponymic units in media discourse: cohesive-referential, specifying-informative, generalizing-economizing, evaluative-framing, mitigating (euphemistic) and persuasive-intensifying. Both languages share these functions, yet they realize them differently. English media favour anaphoric hyperonymic substitution of proper names ("the carmaker", "the 45-year-old") as a means of stylistic variation, whereas Uzbek media rely on demonstrative-plus-hyperonym constructions ("mazkur tashkilot", "ushbu loyiha"), paired words with a collective-hyperonymic meaning ("meva-sabzavot") and abstract hyperonyms typical of the official style ("chora-tadbirlar", "soha"). The findings contribute to comparative lexical semantics, media linguistics and translation practice.
Communicative-Pragmatic Functions of Hyponymy in English And Uzbek Media Texts
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
References
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News discourse. London: Continuum.
Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, D. A. (2000). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vols. 1–2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy and other paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nurmonov, A., Mahmudov, N., Ahmedov, A., & Solixo'jayeva, S. (1992). O'zbek tilining mazmuniy sintaksisi. Toshkent: Fan.
Rahmatullayev, Sh. (2006). Hozirgi adabiy o‘zbek tili. Toshkent: Universitet.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Madvaliyev, A. (Ed.). (2006–2008). O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati (Vols. 1–5). Toshkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi.