This article examines the cultural-cognitive representation of place and object names in Uzbek and English literary prose. The study focuses on the way culturally coded spatial and material units activate conceptual knowledge, cultural associations, social frames, and mental representations in the reader’s cognition. The research is based on Abdulla Qodiriy’s O‘tkan kunlar (Bygone Days) and Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Unlike approaches that treat place and object names primarily as nominative or descriptive elements, the present study interprets them as cognitive triggers participating in the construction of literary space and cultural meaning. The analysis employs the concepts of conceptualization, categorization, frame, cognitive domain, mental space, and cultural knowledge. Particular attention is paid to such place names as Tashkent, Margilan, Longbourn, Meryton, Netherfield, and Pemberley, as well as to culturally meaningful objects and material signs represented in the two novels. The analysis demonstrates that a literary place name may activate a complex network of geographical, social, historical, familial, and cultural knowledge rather than merely identify a physical location. Similarly, an object may acquire cultural significance through its association with social status, gender roles, domestic practices, values, and interpersonal relations. The study proposes a cognitive model in which a culturally coded unit moves from linguistic form through contextual activation and cultural association to conceptualization, frame construction, and the formation of a culturally specific mental space. The comparative analysis reveals both shared cognitive categories and culture-specific ways of organizing literary knowledge in Uzbek and English prose.
Cultural-Cognitive Representation of Places and Objects in Uzbek And English Literary Prose
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
References
Austen, J. (1813). Pride and Prejudice. London: T. Egerton.
Cienki, A. (2013). Frames, idealized cognitive models, and domains. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics also identifies frames, idealized cognitive models, and domains as central constructs in cognitive-linguistic analysis.
Fillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1986). An introduction to cognitive grammar. Cognitive Science, 10(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1001_1
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Qodiriy, A. (2019). O‘tkan kunlar. Toshkent: Navro‘z. The 2019 edition is catalogued as a 400-page Uzbek-language edition.
Qodiriy, A. (2023). O‘tkan kunlar. Toshkent: Ziyo nashr. ISBN 978-9910-733-03-1.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.