English is increasingly used as an academic, professional, and digital lingua franca, yet students do not use it uniformly across social settings. This article examines the sociolinguistic factors associated with students’ English language use, focusing on proficiency, peer networks, teacher encouragement, language attitudes, socioeconomic access, residential background, and communicative context. The paper is designed as a complete model research article and uses a reproducible simulated dataset of 240 university students to demonstrate an analytically coherent quantitative study without representing simulated observations as real human-participant data. A structured questionnaire framework is proposed, and the illustrative analysis includes descriptive statistics, correlations, proficiency-group comparisons, and multiple linear regression. English use is strongest in academic tasks and online communication and weakest in home and family interaction. In the multivariable model, self-rated proficiency, peer-network English use, teacher encouragement, positive attitudes toward English, socioeconomic access, and urban background are all positively associated with overall English use, whereas year of study is not statistically significant. The findings are interpreted through sociolinguistic perspectives on language choice, social networks, identity, linguistic capital, accommodation, and translanguaging. The article argues that English use among students is better understood as a socially situated practice than as a direct reflection of competence alone. Pedagogically, institutions can increase meaningful English use by expanding low-risk interactional opportunities, supporting multilingual repertoires, developing inclusive English-medium practices, and reducing access inequalities. The study also outlines a framework that can be adapted for empirical research in specific universities, regions, or multilingual communities.
The Sociolinguistic Factors Affecting English Language Use Among Students
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Alsulami, B. R. A., Aljabri, R. M., & Alghizzi, T. M. (2026). Classroom code-switching among postgraduate EFL students in Saudi Arabia: Attitudes, reasons, and perceptions. Acta Psychologica, 267, 107007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107007
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
Canagarajah, S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01207.x
Dewaele, J.-M., & Wei, L. (2014). Attitudes towards code-switching among adult mono- and multilingual language users. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35(3), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.859687
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ferguson, G. (2003). Classroom code-switching in post-colonial contexts: Functions, attitudes and policies. AILA Review, 16, 38–51.
Fishman, J. A. (1972). The sociology of language: An interdisciplinary social science approach to language in society. Newbury House.
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (Eds.). (1991). Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Luporini, A., Giacosa, A., & Furiassi, C. (2024). Language proficiency and diversity in students’ attitudes towards code-switching: A case study of English as a foreign language classrooms in Italian tertiary education. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 19, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2024.20805
Moradi, H., & Chen, J. (2022). Attitude-behavior relation and language use: Chinese-English code-switching and code-mixing among Chinese undergraduate students. SAGE Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221142287
Mu, Y., Lee, S., & Choe, H. (2023). Factors influencing English as a lingua franca communication: A case of an international university in China. System, 116, 103075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103075
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.
Yuan, R., Qiu, X., Wang, C., & Zhang, T. (2025). Students’ attitudes toward language learning and use in English-medium instruction (EMI) environments: A mixed methods study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2176506
Appendix A. Proposed Questionnaire Items
Section A: Background information. Suggested items include age range, year of study, field of study, languages used regularly, schooling background, place of residence before university, and optional indicators of access to educational resources.
Section B: English-use frequency (1 = never/very rarely; 5 = very often). (1) I use English when asking or answering questions in class. (2) I use English when discussing academic topics with classmates. (3) I use English when preparing presentations or written assignments. (4) I use English when communicating on social media or online platforms. (5) I use English when watching, reading, or listening to digital content. (6) I use English in informal conversations with friends. (7) I use English with family members. (8) I use English when communicating with people from different linguistic backgrounds.
Section C: Explanatory scales (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). Proficiency: “I can explain complex ideas in English,” “I can follow extended English conversations,” and “I can communicate in English even when I do not know every word.” Peer network: “My close friends often use English,” “English is normal in my peer group,” and “I have friends with whom English is a useful shared language.” Teacher encouragement: “My teachers create opportunities to speak English,” “My teachers respond supportively when students make errors,” and “English is used for meaningful interaction rather than only tests.” Attitudes: “English is useful for my future,” “I enjoy communicating in English,” and “I feel comfortable using English with people who speak it differently from native speakers.” Socioeconomic access: items can assess reliable internet, devices, private or supplementary language instruction, books/media, travel or exchange opportunities, and prior access to English-medium education.
Section D: Open-ended prompts. (1) In which situations do you choose English even when another language is available? Why? (2) In which situations do you avoid English? Why? (3) How do your friends respond when someone speaks English? (4) When does code-switching help you communicate or learn? (5) What could your university do to create better opportunities for English communication without discouraging other languages?