Political discourse relies on linguistic choices that make complex programmes, conflicts and future projections intelligible to broad audiences. Metaphor is especially important because it organizes political concepts, evaluates events and influences listeners’ emotional orientation. This article examines the communicative functions of metaphorical expressions in contemporary English and Uzbek political discourse from a comparative cognitive-pragmatic perspective. The study combines Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Critical Metaphor Analysis, discourse-oriented metaphor research and the principles of MIP/MIPVU. The empirical material is a purposive micro-corpus of official political speeches delivered in Uzbek and English between 2020 and 2024. The analysis shows that JOURNEY, BUILDING, STRUGGLE, BODY/HEALTH and movement-related schemas occur in both discourse traditions, but their communicative realization differs according to rhetorical purpose and institutional context. In the selected English texts, metaphor frequently diagnoses crisis, attributes responsibility and legitimizes difficult policy choices by representing government action as repair, rebuilding or a change of direction. In the Uzbek texts, journey and construction metaphors are particularly productive in representing reform as a collective, historically continuous process and in mobilizing solidarity around national development. The findings demonstrate that metaphor simultaneously simplifies abstract processes, frames evaluation, legitimizes decisions, constructs collective identity, activates emotion and projects desirable futures.
Communicative Functions of Metaphorical Expressions in English And Uzbek Political Discourse
DOI:
Keywords:
Abstract
References
Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. — Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. — ISBN 978-0-226-46801-3.
Kövecses Z. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. — 2nd ed. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. — 400 p. — ISBN 978-0-19-988842-9.
Semino E. Metaphor in Discourse. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. — XII, 247 p. — ISBN 978-0-521-68696-9.
Charteris-Black J. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. — London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. — XV, 278 p. — DOI: 10.1057/9780230000612.
Charteris-Black J. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. — 2nd ed. — London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. — DOI: 10.1057/9780230319899.
Musolff A. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. — London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. — 208 p. — ISBN 978-1-4411-6066-9.
Chilton P. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. — London; New York: Routledge, 2004. — 240 p. — ISBN 0-415-31472-0.
van Dijk T. A. What is Political Discourse Analysis? // Belgian Journal of Linguistics. — 1997. — Vol. 11. — P. 11–52. — DOI: 10.1075/bjl.11.03dij.
Pragglejaz Group. MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse // Metaphor and Symbol. — 2007. — Vol. 22, No. 1. — P. 1–39. — DOI: 10.1080/10926480709336752.
Steen G. J., Dorst A. G., Herrmann J. B., Kaal A. A., Krennmayr T., Pasma T. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. — Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010. — XI, 238 p. — DOI: 10.1075/celcr.14.
Steen G. J. The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor // Metaphor and Symbol. — 2008. — Vol. 23, No. 4. — P. 213–241. — DOI: 10.1080/10926480802426753.
Semino E., Demjén Z., Demmen J. An Integrated Approach to Metaphor and Framing in Cognition, Discourse, and Practice, with an Application to Metaphors for Cancer // Applied Linguistics. — 2018. — Vol. 39, No. 5. — P. 625–645. — DOI: 10.1093/applin/amw028.
Reijnierse W. G., Burgers C., Krennmayr T., Steen G. J. DMIP: A Method for Identifying Potentially Deliberate Metaphor in Language Use // Corpus Pragmatics. — 2018. — Vol. 2, No. 2. — P. 129–147. — DOI: 10.1007/s41701-017-0026-7.
Yakubov F. J. Hozirgi davr ingliz va o‘zbek siyosiy diskursida metaforaning ahamiyati: filologiya fanlari bo‘yicha falsafa doktori (PhD) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. — Samarqand: Samarqand davlat chet tillari instituti, 2026. — 57 b. — URL: official dissertation abstract (accessed: 11.09.2026).
Ruziyeva N. Z., Boltayeva O. A. Metaphorical Expressions in English and Uzbek Political Discourse: A Linguoculturological Analysis // International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics. — 2026. — Vol. 5, No. 3. — P. 12–15. — DOI: 10.51699/ijllal.v5i3.1302.
Mirziyoyev Sh. M. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti Shavkat Mirziyoyevning Oliy Majlisga Murojaatnomasi [Electronic resource]. — 29.12.2020. — URL: President.uz official text (accessed: 11.09.2026).
Mirziyoyev Sh. M. Yangi O‘zbekiston taraqqiyot strategiyasi asosida demokratik islohotlar yo‘lini qat’iy davom ettiramiz [Electronic resource]. — 06.11.2021. — URL: President.uz official text (accessed: 11.09.2026).
Mirziyoyev Sh. M. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti Shavkat Mirziyoyevning Uchinchi Toshkent xalqaro investitsiya forumidagi nutqi [Electronic resource]. — 02.05.2024. — URL: President.uz official text (accessed: 11.09.2026).
Starmer K. PM Speech in Birmingham: 28 October 2024 [Electronic resource]. — London: Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street, 2024. — URL: GOV.UK official transcript (accessed: 11.09.2026).
Starmer K. PM Speech on Migration: 28 November 2024 [Electronic resource]. — London: Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street, 2024. — URL: GOV.UK official transcript (accessed: 11.09.2026).
Reeves R. Autumn Budget 2024 Speech [Electronic resource]. — London: HM Treasury, 2024. — 30 October. — URL: GOV.UK official transcript (accessed: 11.09.2026).