Speaking, Knowing, and Becoming: Epistemic Authority, Power, and the Production of Marginalized Identities

Authors

Aziz Ur Rehman

Institute of language and literature, Riphah international University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Sheher Bano

Institute of language and literature, Riphah international University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Razi Fatima

Institute of language and literature, Riphah international University, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume06Issue08-08

Keywords:

Epistemic authority epistemic injustice marginalized identities power

Abstract

This article develops a critical account of the relationship among speaking, knowing, and becoming in the production of marginalized identities. It argues that epistemic authority is not merely a property of competent individuals but a socially organized relation through which some speakers are recognized as credible knowers while others are discounted, translated, over-scrutinized, or rendered unintelligible. Bringing feminist social epistemology into dialogue with critical race theory, postcolonial theory, sociology of language, and theories of subject formation, the article proposes an Epistemic Authority Identity Production Cycle. The model explains how social position shapes credibility allocation; credibility judgments condition uptake and participation; unequal participation structures collective interpretive resources; and those resources, in turn, stabilize or contest the identities through which people are socially recognized. A critical interpretive review of foundational and contemporary scholarship identifies four recurrent mechanisms: credibility deficit and excess, hermeneutical marginalization, willful ignorance and epistemic exploitation, and institutionalized standards of intelligibility. The article further shows that marginalized identity is neither a fixed antecedent of epistemic injustice nor merely an outcome of discourse. Rather, identity and epistemic authority are recursively co-produced across interactional, organizational, and structural levels. This framework clarifies why inclusion understood only as “giving voice” is insufficient: speech without uptake, participation without interpretive power, and representation without authority can reproduce marginality. The article concludes by outlining principles for epistemic justice centered on accountable listening, plural interpretive infrastructures, redistribution of epistemic labor, institutional reflexivity, and the protection of dissenting and liminal knowers.

References

Alcoff, L. M. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354221

Alcoff, L. M. (2006). Visible identities: Race, gender, and the self. Oxford University Press.

Alcoff, L. M. (2010). Epistemic identities. Episteme, 7(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2010.0003

Anderson, E. (2012). Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652211

Bailey, A. (2017). Tracking privilege-preserving epistemic pushback in feminist and critical race philosophy classes. Hypatia, 32(4), 876–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12354

Berenstain, N. (2016). Epistemic exploitation. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 3, 569–590. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.022

Boncompagni, A., & Coliva, A. (2025). Liminal identities and epistemic injustice: Introduction to the special issue. Social Epistemology, 39(4), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2024.2403631

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford University Press.

Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Cornell University Press.

Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Dotson, K. (2011). Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia, 26(2), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x

Dotson, K. (2012). A cautionary tale: On limiting epistemic oppression. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 33(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.33.1.0024

Dotson, K. (2014). Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology, 28(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782585

Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks (R. Philcox, Trans.). Grove Press. (Original work published 1952)

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.; C. Gordon et al., Trans.). Pantheon Books.

Fricker, M. (1998). Rational authority and social power: Towards a truly social epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 98, 159–177.

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001

Hall, S. (1996). Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). Sage.

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.

hooks, b. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. South End Press.

Hookway, C. (2010). Some varieties of epistemic injustice: Reflections on Fricker. Episteme, 7(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2010.0005

Jenkins, K. (2017). Rape myths and domestic abuse myths as hermeneutical injustices. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12174

Kidd, I. J., & Carel, H. (2017). Epistemic injustice and illness. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(2), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12172

Kidd, I. J., Medina, J., & Pohlhaus, G., Jr. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice. Routledge.

Medina, J. (2012). Hermeneutical injustice and polyphonic contextualism: Social silences and shared hermeneutical responsibilities. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652214

Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. Oxford University Press.

Mills, C. W. (2007). White ignorance. In S. Sullivan & N. Tuana (Eds.), Race and epistemologies of ignorance (pp. 13–38). State University of New York Press.

Pohlhaus, G., Jr. (2012). Relational knowing and epistemic injustice: Toward a theory of willful hermeneutical ignorance. Hypatia, 27(4), 715–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.

Tuana, N. (2004). Coming to understand: Orgasm and the epistemology of ignorance. Hypatia, 19(1), 194–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01275.x