Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

International Journal Of Literature And Languages

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2834
Published Article

Reflection of The National Worldview in Metaphors

Reflection of The National Worldview in Metaphors

  • Hamida Jurakobilova
    Doctor of Philological Sciences (DSc), Professor, Uzbekistan
Cognitive metaphor literary text cognitive approach

This study is devoted to the national-cultural characteristics of cognitive metaphors in the Uzbek language and the challenges of their recreation in translation. Metaphor is a linguistic phenomenon that reflects the national-cultural characteristics and worldview of a people. As a widely used linguopoetic and figurative device across different cultures, metaphor serves to vividly represent literary texts in the reader’s imagination and to reveal the figurative thinking characteristic of individuals within a particular nation. Metaphor is considered an integral part of culture and is shaped by the socio-cultural beliefs and attitudes of a given society. When translating metaphors, significant cultural differences arise due to the unique worldview, traditions, and values of each nation. These differences stem from the varying perceptions of images, realities, and conceptual metaphors across languages and cultures. If a metaphor does not have an equivalent in the target culture, its direct translation may become impossible. Therefore, a cognitive approach to metaphor translation makes it possible to view metaphors as cognitive constructions that conceptually represent human experiences, attitudes, and practices. This article analyzes the national-cultural characteristics of cognitive metaphors in the Uzbek language and the challenges involved in recreating them in translation.

Abdi, M., Umarova, S., Aliqulova, D., Hamida, J., & Bekmuradova, Z. (2021). Reflection of the national vision of the world in phraseological units. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 1281-1290. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1799

Abdulhamid Chulpon, (2019). Day and night. Toshkent: Ilm-ziyo-zakovat, p. 288.

Bouali, M. La problématique de l’intraduisible. Cas de la traduction de la métaphore. Sēmēion Méditerranée, 2020. p.17-26. https://revues.imist.ma/index.php/SEMEION_MED/article/view/23201

Hagström A.C. Un miroir aux alouettes? Stratégies pour la traduction des métaphores. Thèse en langues romanes pour le doctorat ès lettres, l’Université d’Uppsala. – Suède, 2002. pp. 63-65.

Hamida Jurakobilova. (2026). Cognitive Metaphors Based on Zoomorphism in the Uzbek and French Languages. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 6(05), 66-69. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume06Issue05-14.

Juraqobilova, H. X. (2025). KOGNITIV METAFORALAR TARJIMASI: KONSEPTUAL VA MADANIY TAFOVUTLAR TALQINI. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 5(1), 51-59.

Levitskaya, T.R., & Fiterman, A.M. (1963). Theory and practice of translation from English into Russian. М.: Izdatelstvo literaturi na inostrannix yazikax. 125 p.

Mandelblit Nili. (1995). The Cognitive View of Metaphor and its Implications for Translation Theory. In Translation and Meaning: Part 3. p.489.

Sirojiddinov Sh., & Odilova G. (2011). Fundamentals of literary translation. – Tashkent: Mumtoz soʻz. p.16.

Stephane A.Dudoignon. Nuit. France: Bleu autour, 2019. 452 p.

Ulugbek Hamdam. (2013). Translation is an intercultural communication. World Literature. №4 (191). pp. 172-180

Vovk, V.N. (1986). Linguistic Metaphor in Literary Discourse: The Nature of Secondary Nomination. – Kiev: Naukova dumka. p.130.

Yuldoshev, U. (2022) Linguostylistic and Linguocultural Features of Literary Translation. Monograph. Samarkand: Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages. p.83.