Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

International Journal Of Literature And Languages

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2834
Published Article

Uncivil Tongues: Populism, Norm Disruption and The Informalization Of Diplomatic Discourse in The Digital Era

Uncivil Tongues: Populism, Norm Disruption and The Informalization Of Diplomatic Discourse in The Digital Era

  • Guljakhon Juraeva
    ELT Teacher of the Department of Applied Aspects of the English language, Uzbekistan State World Languages University, Uzbekistan
Diplomatic discourse populism informalization Critical Discourse Analysis

The past two decades have witnessed a striking transformation in the language of international diplomacy. Once governed by strict protocols, carefully calibrated formality, and a shared grammar of restraint, diplomatic discourse has increasingly been colonized by the rhetorical habits of populism — blunt, emotive, adversarial, and relentlessly oriented toward domestic audiences. This article examines how the rise of populist political movements, combined with the structural affordances of digital communication platforms, has disrupted long-standing norms of formal diplomatic exchange. Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and theories of mediatization, the study analyzes specific instances of populist diplomatic communication from the United States, Brazil, Hungary, and the United Kingdom, arguing that what appears as mere stylistic informality carries profound consequences for the architecture of international norms, multilateral institutions, and global governance. The findings suggest that the informalization of diplomatic discourse is not a temporary aberration but a structural reconfiguration with lasting implications for how states communicate, negotiate, and signal intent on the world stage.

Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.

Brands, H. (2018). American grand strategy in the age of Trump. Brookings Institution Press.

Daddow, O. (2019). GlobalBritain™: The discursive construction of Britain's post-Brexit world role. Global Affairs, 5(1), 5–22.

Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.

Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Routledge.

Krastev, I., & Holmes, S. (2019). The light that failed: A reckoning. Allen Lane.

Kupchan, C. A. (2020). Isolationism: A history of America's efforts to shield itself from the world. Oxford University Press.

Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. Routledge.

Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Saraiva, M. G. (2020). The Bolsonaro government and Brazilian foreign policy: Change or continuity? Brazilian Political Science Review, 14(2), e0002.

Shipman, T. (2017). Fall out: A year of political mayhem. William Collins.

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology and discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 9, pp. 728–740). Elsevier.

Viola, E., & Basso, L. (2020). Bolsonaro's anti-environmental foreign policy and the rise of ecocide. Latin American Policy, 11(2), 279–300.