Skip to main content
editor@theusajournals.com | Oscar Publishing Services Journal Home

International Journal Of Literature And Languages

Peer Reviewed | Open Access | E-ISSN: 2771-2834
Published Article

From Proper Nouns to Proper Nominals: Morphosyntactic Evidence from English and Uzbek

From Proper Nouns to Proper Nominals: Morphosyntactic Evidence from English and Uzbek

  • Abdurahimova Durdona Tavakkaljonqizi
    PhD researcher of Fergana state university, Uzbekistan
Proper nominal morphosyntax onomastics capitalisation morphological reduction English Uzbek cross-linguistic.

What makes a proper name a proper name? Standard grammars answer with two criteria: it is a noun, and it bears a capital letter. Yet proper names in authentic corpora routinely take the form of abbreviations (BBC), blends (Brexit), hashtags (#brexitshambles), and clause-length titles — none of which fits the "noun-plus-capital" formula. This article argues that these anomalies dissolve once proper names are analysed as proper nominals — sub-phrasal units that target the intermediate level between the bare noun and the full noun phrase. Drawing on a reanalysis of 187 English proper nominal tokens from Brexit-era discourse and a comparative dataset of 43 Uzbek anthroponym tokens, we identify three formal delimitation mechanisms — typographic, morphological, and syntactic — and demonstrate that all three systematically converge on the nominal level rather than the word or phrase level. A cross-linguistic comparison with Uzbek reveals that the nominal level hypothesis holds in a language without articles, where case suffixes attach directly to the proper nominal, confirming that the nominal is a language-universal structural target rather than an English-specific artefact. The analysis critically extends Philippe's (2023) framework by providing explicit formal diagnostics that resolve the circularity risk in purely functional definitions of the proper name.

Acuña-Fariña, J. C. (2009). The Puzzle of Apposition. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Acuña-Fariña, J. C. (2012). The grammars of close apposition. Journal of English Linguistics, 40(3), 217–261.

Algeo, J. (1973). On Defining the Proper Name. University of Florida Press.

Allan, K. (1980). Nouns and countability. Language, 56(3), 541–567.

Anderson, J. M. (2007). On the grammatical status of names. Language, 83(4), 753–783.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman.

Brinton, L., & Traugott, E. C. (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge University Press.

Caleffi, P.-M. (2015). The "hashtag": A new word or a new rule? Skase Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 12(2), 46–69.

Gary-Prieur, M.-N. (1994). Le nom propre constitue-t-il unecatégorielinguistique? Langue française, 102, 4–25.

Gil-Vilaboa, V. (2019). Quirky NPs with Special Reference to Short Appositions [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.

Jakobson, R. (1971). Word and Language. De Gruyter.

Keizer, E. (2007). Close appositions. In The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Categorization (pp. 155–208). Cambridge University Press.

Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford University Press.

Leroy, S. (2004). Entre identification et catégorisation: l'antonomase du nom propre enfrançais [Doctoral dissertation]. Université Paul Valéry Montpellier III.

Mignot, E. (2018). La morphologie du nom enanglais — versunesémantique des parties du discours [HDR Monograph]. Sorbonne Université.

Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic. Longmans, Green.

Nyström, S. (2016). Names and meaning. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (pp. 39–51). Oxford University Press.

Philippe, M. (2020). Le nominal propre. Étude du nom propre enanglais [Doctoral dissertation]. Sorbonne Université.

Philippe, M. (2023). Morpho-syntaxesémantique des nominauxpropres. Corela, HS-40. https://doi.org/10.4000/corela.16236

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., &Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.

Van Langendonck, W. (2007). Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Mouton de Gruyter.

Van Langendonck, W., & Vande Velde, M. (2016). Names and grammar. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (pp. 17–38). Oxford University Press.

Vaxelaire, J.-L. (2006). Le nom propre encontexte. In D. Blampain et al. (Eds.), Mots, termes et contextes (pp. 217–226). Archives Contemporaines.

Wilmet, M. (1995). Nom propre et ambiguïté. Langue française, 92(1), 113–124.