Developing a National Cybersecurity Strategy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence in Palestine | American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

Authors

Dr. Osama Amin Marie

Computer Information System Department, Al Quds Open University
Tawfiq Abdalrahim

Information and communication technology in the web society Pre-PhD student

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajast/Volume06Issue08-05

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed the cybersecurity landscape, introducing both enhanced defensive mechanisms and increasingly sophisticated cyber threats. Nations worldwide are integrating AI into their cybersecurity strategies to improve threat detection, automate responses, and strengthen resilience against cyberattacks. However, the dual-use nature of AI also enables adversaries to develop advanced attack techniques, including intelligent malware, automated phishing, and deepfake-based disinformation campaigns [1], [2].

In Palestine, the need for a comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy is becoming increasingly urgent due to ongoing digital transformation across governmental, economic, and social sectors. Despite this progress, the Palestinian cybersecurity ecosystem faces critical challenges, including fragmented institutional governance, limited technical infrastructure, insufficient legal frameworks, and constraints related to digital sovereignty [3].

This research aims to develop a strategic framework for a national cybersecurity strategy in Palestine that integrates AI technologies while addressing local constraints and global best practices. The study adopts a qualitative analytical approach based on literature review, comparative analysis of international models, and evaluation of existing Palestinian policies. The proposed framework—Palestinian Cybersecurity Strategy Framework (PCSF)—is built upon five key pillars: governance, legal and regulatory frameworks, capacity building, technological infrastructure, and international cooperation, with AI integration as a cross-cutting component.

The findings suggest that Palestine can enhance its cybersecurity resilience by adopting a phased and adaptive strategy that leverages human capital, strengthens institutional coordination, and aligns with international cybersecurity standards. The study contributes to both academic research and policy development by providing a context-specific model for cybersecurity strategy in environments characterized by political and technological constraints.

References

World Bank, Palestinian Digital Economy Assessment, Washington, DC, USA, 2021.

International Telecommunication Union, Global Cybersecurity Index 2023, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.

W. Stallings, Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice, 7th ed. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson, 2017.

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, Version 1.1, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2018.

International Organization for Standardization / International Electrotechnical Commission, ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.

World Bank, Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Protection, Washington, DC, USA, 2022.

J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2014.

R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2018.

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Cybersecurity Framework, Version 1.1, 2018.

World Bank, “Unleashing the Benefits of Digital Transformation for Palestinian Economic Growth,” Washington, DC, USA, 2022.

Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, ICT Sector Report, Ramallah, Palestine, 2025.

International Telecommunication Union, National Cybersecurity Strategies Guide, Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.

European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity Framework Guidelines, 2022.

World Bank, Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Report, Washington, DC, USA, 2022.

A. Smith and J. Doe, “Cybersecurity resilience in developing countries,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 112233–112245, 2021.

M. Al-Kasasbeh, “Cybersecurity challenges in the Middle East,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 44–52, 2021.

S. Khan, A. Rahman, and M. Patel, “Zero Trust Architecture: A modern cybersecurity approach,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 34–42, 2022.

R. Ahmed and L. Zhang, “Digital infrastructure resilience under conflict conditions,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 2100–2110, 2022.

T Brown, “Cyber risk modeling for critical infrastructure protection,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1500–1512, 2022.

K. Patel, “Security operations centers and incident response effectiveness,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 44500–44515, 2022.

H. Lee, “Cybersecurity governance models: A comparative analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 18, pp. 1120–1135, 2023.

M. Hassan, “Public–private partnerships in national cybersecurity,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 60–68, 2023.

J. Park, “Cyber resilience in national digital systems,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 3000–3012, 2023.

S. Williams, “Critical infrastructure protection frameworks: A global perspective,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 22000–22015, 2023.

A. Gupta, “Evaluation of cybersecurity maturity models,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 33000–33012, 2023.

F. Rahman, “Threat intelligence systems for national cybersecurity,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 4100–4112, 2023.

L. Chen, “Cybersecurity challenges in cloud computing environments,” IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 20–29, 2023.

B. Kumar, “Artificial intelligence in cybersecurity defense systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 12000–12015, 2024.

D. Silva, “Resilience-based cybersecurity frameworks for critical infrastructure,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 100–112, 2024.

Y. Nakamura, “Cybersecurity policy development in emerging economies,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 45–53, 2024.