Abstract
This paper explores the concepts of challenge-stress and hindrance-stress and their implications for individual well-being. Challenge-stress refers to stressors that individuals perceive as opportunities for growth, learning, and achievement, while hindrance-stress arises from stressors perceived as obstacles or threats to one's goals and well-being. Through an examination of the literature on stress psychology and organizational behavior, this paper elucidates the distinct characteristics of challenge-stress and hindrance-stress, their effects on psychological and physiological health, and strategies for effectively navigating them. Understanding the nuanced nature of these stressors is crucial for promoting resilience, enhancing coping strategies, and fostering well-being in both personal and professional contexts.
Keywords:
Challenge-stress, hindrance-stress, well-being
References
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company.
Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438-454.
Selye, H. (1974). Stress without distress. J. B. Lippincott.
Turner, N., Barling, J., & Zacharatos, A. (2002). Positive psychology at work. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 715-728). Oxford University Press.
Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Christiansen, N. D. (2010). Toward a better understanding of the effects of hindrance and challenge stressors on work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(1), 68-77.
van den Tooren, M., de Jonge, J., & Dormann, C. (2012). The demand–induced strain compensation model: Renewed theoretical considerations and meta‐analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(3), 312-329.
McEwen, B. S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiological Reviews, 87(3), 873-904.
Grant, A. M., & Schwartz, B. (2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 61-76.
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204-221.
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 745-774.
