American Journal of Philological Sciences

Decoding Cultural Embodiment: A Systematic Linguocultural Approach to Nonverbal Expressions of National Identity

2026-07-01T11:37:52+00:00

Nonverbal communication serves as a fundamental medium through which cultural identity is embodied, transmitted, and interpreted. This study explores the linguocultural mechanisms underlying nonverbal expressions as carriers of national identity. Drawing on theoretical insights from ethnopsycholinguistics and linguoculturology, the paper proposes a systematic analytical framework for decoding embodied cultural meanings embedded in gestures, facial expressions, and bodily codes. The research integrates conceptual models of cultural codes, stereotype formation, and pragmatic communication to examine how nonverbal signs function as culturally encoded semiotic systems. The study identifies key patterns in the construction and interpretation of national identity through nonverbal means and highlights the role of cultural cognition in shaping communicative practices. Findings demonstrate that nonverbal representations are not merely auxiliary to verbal discourse but operate as independent carriers of culturally specific knowledge structures. The research contributes to linguocultural theory by offering a structured methodological approach for analyzing embodied cultural signs and underscores the implications for intercultural communication, discourse analysis, and semiotics.

Metaphorical Conceptualization of Loneliness in Uzbek And English: A Cognitive Linguistic Perspective

2026-07-24T13:32:03+00:00

This study explores how the concept of loneliness is metaphorically represented in Uzbek and English through the lens of cognitive linguistics. It seeks to identify the conceptual metaphors used to express loneliness and examine the similarities and differences in how these metaphors reflect the cognitive and cultural perspectives of the two languages. The research is grounded in Conceptual Metaphor Theory and applies comparative, descriptive, and cognitive-semantic approaches to analyze linguistic data.

The findings show that loneliness is commonly understood through metaphorical concepts such as darkness, emptiness, silence, distance, and confinement. Although these metaphorical patterns appear in both languages and reflect shared human cognitive experiences, their meanings and usage are shaped by the unique cultural values and worldviews of each linguistic community. The study demonstrates that metaphor functions as an important cognitive tool for organizing and expressing complex emotional experiences. By comparing Uzbek and English, this research contributes to the fields of cognitive linguistics and linguocultural studies, highlighting both universal and culture-specific ways of conceptualizing loneliness.

Historical-Evolutionary Development and Structural-Semantic Specificity of Kinship Terminosystems In Differently Structured Languages

2026-07-17T11:17:05+00:00

The study provides a comprehensive comparative, typological, and diachronic analysis of kinship and affinity terminosystems across three typologically diverse languages: English (Analytical/Germanic), Russian (Inflectional/Slavic), and Uzbek (Agglutinative/Turkic). Using componential modeling and corpus-driven verification methods based on data from the British National Corpus (BNC), the Russian National Corpus (RNC), and the Uzbek National Corpus (UzNC), the author reconstructs the evolutionary trajectories of social nomenclature. The paper highlights the Middle English lexical shock and the subsequent emergence of the symmetric "in-law" analytical subsystem, contrasting it with the persistent inflectional asymmetry and precise lexicalization of separate affinal slots within the Russian system, as well as the profound ethno-pragmatic density (P_eth) of the Turkic kinship matrix, where age and gender boundaries remain strictly unneutralized. The results demonstrate that while Western European terminosystems evolve toward legal abstractness and semantic economy, the Uzbek terminosystem preserves its anthropocentric and ritual-etiquette framing.

A Corpus-Based Comparative Analysis of Hedges in Uzbek And English Research Articles (Hedges)

2026-07-24T13:34:17+00:00

Academic writing across languages relies heavily on pragmatic strategies to modulate propositional force, express uncertainty, and establish interpersonal stance. Hedging—a communicative device used to mitigate the commitment of authors toward their assertions—plays a pivotal role in negotiating claims within scientific discourse. This study presents a corpus-based comparative analysis of hedging devices in academic research articles written in Uzbek and English within the field of philology. Based on a localized parallel corpus of 40 peer-reviewed research papers (20 published in Uzbek OAK-indexed journals and 20 in English SCOPUS/Web of Science-indexed publications between 2018 and 2024), this research quantifies and classifies hedges using Hyland’s taxonomy. The empirical findings reveal a significantly higher total frequency of hedging instances in English research articles (58.4 markers per 1,000 words) compared to Uzbek research articles (22.1 markers per 1,000 words). Modal verbs and epistemic verbs constitute the majority of hedging devices in English, whereas Uzbek authors rely primarily on lexical adverbs, conditional constructions, and passive voice structures. The analysis highlights distinct cultural, epistemological, and stylistic conventions governing scholarly communication in the two traditions.

The Function of Architectural Lexemes in Creating Color in Historical Literary Texts

2026-07-22T20:59:10+00:00

In this article architectural lexicon, diaphragm, corpus (terms), passage, interdisciplinary terms, semantic-functional analysis, syntagmatic relations, corpus types (normative-mechanical, buildings, military unit), corpus (meaning in linguistics), the lexeme "project", analyzed lexico-semantically.