EXPLORING THE TERMINOLOGICAL NEXUS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UZBEK FOLK WEAVING AND ENGLISH-ORIGIN TERMS

Abstract

Uzbek folk weaving stands as a testament to centuries-old traditions, intricately woven into the fabric of Uzbek culture and heritage. The lexicon associated with this rich tradition reflects a profound interconnection between language and craft. Conversely, English, with its diverse linguistic heritage, offers a unique perspective on weaving terminology. This article aims to undertake a comprehensive comparative analysis of the terminological nuances between Uzbek folk weaving and English-origin terms. Through this exploration, we seek to elucidate the intricate interplay between linguistic expression, cultural context, and craft techniques.

Keywords:

Uzbek folk weaving, terminology, comparative study

References

Binswanger, H. P., Rosenzweig, M. R. (1986). Behavioural and Material Determinants of Production Relations in Agriculture. Journal of Development Studies, 22(3), 503–539.

Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J. and Lee, J. W. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115-135.

Burkitbayeva, S., Qiam, M., Swinnen, J. (2016). A black (white) hole in the global spread of GM cotton. Trends in Biotechnology, 34 (4), 260-263

Djanibekov, N. (2016). Agricultural Restructuring, Water Scarcity and the Adaptation to Climate Change in Central Asia: A Five-Country Study (AGRIWANET). Presented at during the Kazakhstan research workshop, IAMO, Halle (Saale), February 10, 2016.

Djanibekov, N., van Assche, K., Bobojonov, I., Lamers, J. (2012). Farm Restructuring and Land Consolidation in Uzbekistan: New Farms with Old Barriers. Europe‐Asia Studies, 64, 1101– 1126.

Djanibekov, U., van Assche, K., Boezeman, D. and Djanibekov, N. (2013). Understanding contracts in evolving agro-economies: Fermers, dekhqans and networks in Khoresm, Uzbekistan. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 137-147.

Dries, L. and Swinnen, J. (2004). Foreign direct investment, vertical integration, and local suppliers: evidence from the Polish dairy sector. World Development, 32(9), 1525–1544.

Glover, D. and Kusterer, K. (1990). Small Farmers, Big Business: Contract Farming and Rural

Development. London: Macmillan.

Gow, H. and Swinnen, J. (2001). Private enforcement capital and contract enforcement in

transition countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 686–690.

10.Key, N. and Runsten, D. (1999). Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: the organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World Development, 27(2), 381–401.

Lerman, Z. (2010). Agricultural recovery and individual land tenure: Evidence from Central Asia. Imre Ferto, Csaba Forgacs, Attila Jambor (Eds.): Changing landscape of European agriculture. Essays in honour of professor Csaba Csaki. Budapest: Agroinform, pp. 95–113.

Little, P. and Watts, M. (1994). Living Under Contract: Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

Mensch, G. (1979). Stalemate in Technology: Innovations overcome the Depression. Cambridge, Masachusetts, pp. 87–90.

Morrissy, J. D. (1974). Agricultural Modernization through Production Contracting. New York: Praeger.

Pandey, P. (2013). Triple Helix for Communication of Innovations: Case Study of Bt Cotton in India. Asian Biotechnology & Development Review, 15(1), 21-42.

Petrick, M. and Djanibekov, N. (2015). Institutional change in land and labour relations of Central Asia’s irrigated agriculture (AGRICHANGE). Project description. IAMO.

Petrick, M. and Djanibekov, N. (2016). Obstacles to crop diversification and cotton harvest mechanisation: Farm survey evidence from two contrasting districts in Uzbekistan: IAMO Discussion Papers 153. Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).

Pomfret, R. (2008). Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, Ch 8. In Dostortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe’s Transition Economies. K. Anderson and J. Swinnen (Eds.). World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 297-338.